Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

timo86m

  • 2 years ago

for nin And using calc to derive this formula

  • This Question is Closed
  1. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    1 Attachment
  2. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @nincompoop

  3. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

  4. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes i remember integrating with time.

  5. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The central science book is not that advanced then since it just gives you formulas but doesn't explain how to reach that conclusion

  6. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    calc 2 in this case. There is also some advanced wave function kinda stuff.

  7. timo86m
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    in the electronic structure of matter chapter luckily it dont go too far. It just gives you equations you will use.

  8. abb0t
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Is this for thermodynamics? D:

  9. abb0t
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    For a reaction of the form: A --> product a first order rate law takes the form: \[r = k_{1^{st}}[A]^1\] writing it in differentials, you get: \[\frac{ d[A] }{ dt } = -k_{1^{st}}[A]\] The minus sign as A is a reactant and so its concentration decreases with time (whici is the slope of a graph of [A] against time will be negativ when you graph it) The variables [A] and t can be separated to give: \[\frac{ 1 }{ [A] }d[A] = -k_{1^{st}}dt\] which CAN be integrated easily! \[\int\limits \frac{ 1 }{ [A] }d[A] = \int\limits -k_{1^{st}}dt\] this gives: \[\ln[A] = -k_{1^{st}}t + C\] The constant can be removed by supposing that at t = 0 since \[[A] = [A]_0\] which is the initial concentration of A giving us: \[\ln[A] = -k_{1^{st}}t + \ln[A]_0\] to simplify it a bit more to a form that might be more familiar to you is: \[[A] = [A]_0 e^{(-k_{1^{st}}t)} \]

  10. nincompoop
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @abb0t I think what you did is the same to what I attached

  11. abb0t
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh. Lol. My bad. haha.

  12. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.