Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

gorica

  • 2 years ago

Let W, S, T be subspaces of finite-dimensional vector space such that S∩T=S∩W S+T=S+W, and W is subset of T. Prove that W=T.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Edutopia
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ..

  2. abb0t
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Definition of Composition?

  3. malevolence19
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm not sure of a formal proof but if you think about it the only way that S+T=S+W is if they are the same. If they were not the same that would mean there is an element of T not in W or an element of W not in T. If not you'd have something like {1,2}+{3,4,5}={1,2}+{3,4,6} implies {1,2,3,4,5}={1,2,3,4,6} which is not true obviously. It is still true that their intersections can be equal. {1,2} intersect {3,4,5} is the same as {1,2} intersect {3,4,6} (in this case the empty set). I think that the fact of their intersections with S are equal is superfluous information but I didn't care for proofs too much.

  4. gorica
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    actually, I have to prove that T is subset of W, using what is given, and that will imply that T=W since I already have given that W is subset of T.

  5. AddemF
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Consider any arbitrary element of T, call it t. We want to show that t is in W. Suppose that t is not in W and let's try to get a contradiction. If t is not in W then it is still in S+T which is the same as S+W and so there exist some s in S and w in W such that t = s+w. But since we know W is a subset of T, then this w is in T. For that reason, let's re-name it t1, to show that it is actually in T. That means t = s+t1. And since the intersection of S and T is a subspace, it is closed under addition. Therefore s+t1 is an element of the intersection of S and T, and since this is the same thing as t, then t is in the intersection of S and T. But the intersection of S and T is the same as the intersection of S and W. This means t is in W. This contradicts our initial assumption. Therefore t is in W. By definition of set inclusion, T is a subset of W.

  6. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.