Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
I wish so hard for a time machine. Even if it was for once. I wish for it.
 one year ago
 one year ago
I wish so hard for a time machine. Even if it was for once. I wish for it.
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

shubhamsrgBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
bhaad me gaya CoC ! kyun? ;)
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Please some one help me build the time machine with your mathematical powers :P
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
If I had a time machine, I would go to the future in a time where a moderator is online and make him delete this post. ;)
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
And go to the physics section; a time machine is physical  not mathematical...
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Mission Disturb Another Group: successful :D
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Well I guess it is some how mathematical too.
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
probability is zero
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Hmm. Is there any research work being done ?
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
yaa there many research regarding the time ravel rather then time machine. first they want to confirm whether time ravel is possible or not.
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Um,Is time a vector quantity then ?
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
yaa .. In order to time travel we need to move in the speed of light or greater than that . which is called as cosmic speed limit. recently only they proved that higgs bosons can travel at a velocity greater than light speed . so scientist are trying some means to travel at light speed.
 one year ago

shubhamsrgBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
well i should warn all dont underestimate or forget RAJNIKANTH here.. :
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Yes, Hawkins showed that... but we can only travel to the future
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
yaa @ParthKohli your right .. we can only go to future.. not the past
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
If we go into the future we will not be able to return back ?
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
higgs bosons can Not travel at a velocity greater than light speed. what ever gave you that idea @chandhuru ?
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Time travelling has different meaning 1. in this case they say there is a parallel universe existing and we can use worm holes as a gate way to reach the other universe. 2. consider the case ur sitting in a train which can move at the speed of light . your train starts moving in the year 2000. as ur moving at the speed of light the time frame moves slowly. ur travelling in that train for 50 years . when the train stops and u come down . u will see the people 50 years older but ur age will less than them. this is because ur time frame moved slowly relatively.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
Actually \(c\) is the max possible speed. A proton reached \(\approx 0.99c\) once.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
@chandhuru I watched the exact thing on Discovery Channel! :O
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
It also said that time moves slowly around the pyramids.
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
@UnkleRhaukus they proved recently in large haldron collider (LHC). i read an article and they proved it. U can google it if u want.
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
no object with mass can reach c
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
they are trying ... see when an object is kept near a black hole it is sucked into it at the velocity of light and the object is converted into energy.
 one year ago

ParthKohliBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
We cannot see an object getting sucked into a black hole.
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
CERN did a press release about neutrinos exceeding the speed of light a while ago , but this turned out to be a huge embarrassing mistake no object of mass can exceed c
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
it would require infinite energy
 one year ago

chandhuruBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
@UnkleRhaukus that experiment was carried out twice .. and both the time they got almost same result. neutrinos were travelling at 1/60 seconds faster than light. they did these experiments using atomic clocks to validate it. CERN said that they will do it again so that they can affirmatively say that neutrinos travel faster than light.
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
also higgs boson is not the same as a neutrino
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
Its worth noting here that you could travel backwards in time, its just a more complex theory, in order to go to the future you have to travel faster than the speed of light...
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
WHICH is IMPOSSIBLE
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
ehh to an extent, if you moved through a wormhole and appeared on the other side of the universe you technically traveled faster than the speed of light if you take speed=Distance/time
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
there is no evidence for wormholes
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
sure there is, its a mathematical solution....
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
mathematical theory IS NOT physical evidence
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
alright fair enough however there is no evidence that suggest the impossibility of it correct?
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
also if an object gets close to a black hole the gravity pulls it faster than the speed of light then crushes it...
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
i give up. im too angry now
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
dw:1356626253968:dw
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
that is not how relativity works @sauravshakya
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
hey unklerhaukus, can i pm you a question real quick?
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
@unkle i cant pm unless you fan me real quick
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I would be great if some one explain me how relativity works
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
"you put your hand on a hot stove one second seems like an hour, you put your hand on a hot woman one hour seems like one second"
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
i sent you a pm that better describes it...
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Actually once my physics teacher gave me a book "GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY" But I never read it as I found it very boring and time consuming when I asked this question to him...
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So, can u plz make it short and simple?
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
relativity... it says that time is relative in the sense that if you move at the speed of light what you see and someone else sees is different due to the observational points
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
the speed of light in a vacuum is measured the same no matter how fast you are going ,
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
i never said the speed of light changes....
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
And how does it explain my question?
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
well even if you are moving approximately 2.9x10^8 m/s , and you measure light coming towards you from the front it will be c, and then you measure light coming towards you from the back , and it's it is still c
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
because its a lovely question that can be explained through mathematics
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
unfortunately i dont know the mathematics behind it i know the logic and philosophy....
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
i think im holding a good debate for a 15 year old self educated kid ehh?
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
If i can travel with the speed of light i can teleport :P
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
well take it from me im doing good lmao
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
@hba not really, speed of light is 186,000 miles per second so you could go 186000 miles in one second....
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I guess no mass can travel faster than light as its mass tends to infinity at very higher speed....
 one year ago

sauravshakyaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So, infinite energy willl be needed
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
a tachyon is an unproven object that doesnt have mass, so therefore doesnt violate the laws of physics....
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
tachyon moves with the speed of light ?
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
But there is no tachyon absorved yet ?
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
if tachyons exist they are an exception to the theory of special relativity....
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukusBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
No compelling evidence for tachyons has been found
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
dw:1356628459045:dw
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
that drawing represents that you can only travel forward in time if you move faster using this logic if you can move at negative speeds you can go back in time.... Scenario #2: If you move at the speed of light all things will appear to slow down and eventually stop moving, therefore if you move faster the slower things will move, and they will eventually go backwards thus moving you into the past not the future
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
both scenarios are equally logical, this is the ONLY problem i have not been able to decide what happens...
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
any extra input on what would happen?
 one year ago

hbaBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Not really. Maybe @UnkleRhaukus would have something to say.
 one year ago

HrolflingerBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
i think i just need a second view on it, i cant find any flaws with the logic in this so i dont know which would happen.... unless both happen... hmm i think i just had an epiphany
 one year ago

DLSBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
u need agar agar solution with 2 moles of cynamisdhejsliol for that
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.