A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
hba
 3 years ago
I wish so hard for a time machine. Even if it was for once. I wish for it.
hba
 3 years ago
I wish so hard for a time machine. Even if it was for once. I wish for it.

This Question is Closed

shubhamsrg
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1bhaad me gaya CoC ! kyun? ;)

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Please some one help me build the time machine with your mathematical powers :P

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3If I had a time machine, I would go to the future in a time where a moderator is online and make him delete this post. ;)

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3And go to the physics section; a time machine is physical  not mathematical...

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Mission Disturb Another Group: successful :D

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well I guess it is some how mathematical too.

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0probability is zero

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Hmm. Is there any research work being done ?

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1yaa there many research regarding the time ravel rather then time machine. first they want to confirm whether time ravel is possible or not.

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Um,Is time a vector quantity then ?

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1yaa .. In order to time travel we need to move in the speed of light or greater than that . which is called as cosmic speed limit. recently only they proved that higgs bosons can travel at a velocity greater than light speed . so scientist are trying some means to travel at light speed.

shubhamsrg
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1well i should warn all dont underestimate or forget RAJNIKANTH here.. :

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Yes, Hawkins showed that... but we can only travel to the future

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1yaa @ParthKohli your right .. we can only go to future.. not the past

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If we go into the future we will not be able to return back ?

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0higgs bosons can Not travel at a velocity greater than light speed. what ever gave you that idea @chandhuru ?

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Time travelling has different meaning 1. in this case they say there is a parallel universe existing and we can use worm holes as a gate way to reach the other universe. 2. consider the case ur sitting in a train which can move at the speed of light . your train starts moving in the year 2000. as ur moving at the speed of light the time frame moves slowly. ur travelling in that train for 50 years . when the train stops and u come down . u will see the people 50 years older but ur age will less than them. this is because ur time frame moved slowly relatively.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Actually \(c\) is the max possible speed. A proton reached \(\approx 0.99c\) once.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3@chandhuru I watched the exact thing on Discovery Channel! :O

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3It also said that time moves slowly around the pyramids.

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1@UnkleRhaukus they proved recently in large haldron collider (LHC). i read an article and they proved it. U can google it if u want.

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no object with mass can reach c

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1they are trying ... see when an object is kept near a black hole it is sucked into it at the velocity of light and the object is converted into energy.

ParthKohli
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3We cannot see an object getting sucked into a black hole.

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0CERN did a press release about neutrinos exceeding the speed of light a while ago , but this turned out to be a huge embarrassing mistake no object of mass can exceed c

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it would require infinite energy

chandhuru
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1@UnkleRhaukus that experiment was carried out twice .. and both the time they got almost same result. neutrinos were travelling at 1/60 seconds faster than light. they did these experiments using atomic clocks to validate it. CERN said that they will do it again so that they can affirmatively say that neutrinos travel faster than light.

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0also higgs boson is not the same as a neutrino

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Its worth noting here that you could travel backwards in time, its just a more complex theory, in order to go to the future you have to travel faster than the speed of light...

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0WHICH is IMPOSSIBLE

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2ehh to an extent, if you moved through a wormhole and appeared on the other side of the universe you technically traveled faster than the speed of light if you take speed=Distance/time

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0there is no evidence for wormholes

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2sure there is, its a mathematical solution....

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0mathematical theory IS NOT physical evidence

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2alright fair enough however there is no evidence that suggest the impossibility of it correct?

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2also if an object gets close to a black hole the gravity pulls it faster than the speed of light then crushes it...

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i give up. im too angry now

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1356626253968:dw

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that is not how relativity works @sauravshakya

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2hey unklerhaukus, can i pm you a question real quick?

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2@unkle i cant pm unless you fan me real quick

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I would be great if some one explain me how relativity works

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2"you put your hand on a hot stove one second seems like an hour, you put your hand on a hot woman one hour seems like one second"

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2i sent you a pm that better describes it...

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Actually once my physics teacher gave me a book "GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY" But I never read it as I found it very boring and time consuming when I asked this question to him...

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So, can u plz make it short and simple?

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2relativity... it says that time is relative in the sense that if you move at the speed of light what you see and someone else sees is different due to the observational points

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the speed of light in a vacuum is measured the same no matter how fast you are going ,

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2i never said the speed of light changes....

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And how does it explain my question?

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0well even if you are moving approximately 2.9x10^8 m/s , and you measure light coming towards you from the front it will be c, and then you measure light coming towards you from the back , and it's it is still c

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2because its a lovely question that can be explained through mathematics

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2unfortunately i dont know the mathematics behind it i know the logic and philosophy....

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2i think im holding a good debate for a 15 year old self educated kid ehh?

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If i can travel with the speed of light i can teleport :P

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2well take it from me im doing good lmao

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2@hba not really, speed of light is 186,000 miles per second so you could go 186000 miles in one second....

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I guess no mass can travel faster than light as its mass tends to infinity at very higher speed....

sauravshakya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So, infinite energy willl be needed

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2a tachyon is an unproven object that doesnt have mass, so therefore doesnt violate the laws of physics....

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0tachyon moves with the speed of light ?

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But there is no tachyon absorved yet ?

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2if tachyons exist they are an exception to the theory of special relativity....

UnkleRhaukus
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0No compelling evidence for tachyons has been found

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2dw:1356628459045:dw

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2that drawing represents that you can only travel forward in time if you move faster using this logic if you can move at negative speeds you can go back in time.... Scenario #2: If you move at the speed of light all things will appear to slow down and eventually stop moving, therefore if you move faster the slower things will move, and they will eventually go backwards thus moving you into the past not the future

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2both scenarios are equally logical, this is the ONLY problem i have not been able to decide what happens...

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2any extra input on what would happen?

hba
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Not really. Maybe @UnkleRhaukus would have something to say.

Hrolflinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2i think i just need a second view on it, i cant find any flaws with the logic in this so i dont know which would happen.... unless both happen... hmm i think i just had an epiphany

DLS
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0u need agar agar solution with 2 moles of cynamisdhejsliol for that
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.