• anonymous
Can be proved that \(\emptyset \) is a subset of every set?
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • anonymous
Since the empty set contains no elements, the fact that:\[(\forall A), \emptyset\subseteq A\]is whats called vacuously true. In other words, its true by default, because there is nothing to check. It would be like going into a room of people where there are no cell phones, and saying "there are no cell phones on." That is vacuously true, because there arent any cell phones to check.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.