anonymous
  • anonymous
Complex number in circuit
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
How to find the thevenin for c-d terminal ?
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
I mean, thevenin voltage :)
ghazi
  • ghazi
|dw:1356752136345:dw| open the current source and short the voltage source you will get Rth

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I did, but I didn't get the right answer :(
ghazi
  • ghazi
hold on let me solve
anonymous
  • anonymous
I got 2.667 – j4 Ω for Rth, n the answer for Vth is 9.614∠56.31° V
ghazi
  • ghazi
did you convert 2.667 -j4 into polar form , you've got right answer
anonymous
  • anonymous
i got the Rth, but Vth ... I get it wrong :( wondering where's my mistake, Im using mesh analysis to find current flowing through capacitor, n times the capacitor to get Vth ... am I wrong ?
ghazi
  • ghazi
i think you should be using superposition principle
anonymous
  • anonymous
ehh ehh, isn't it suppose to be supermesh ? D: there's current source within the loop
ghazi
  • ghazi
there will be nothing messy , give a try by that first eliminate current source and then eliminate voltage one
anonymous
  • anonymous
ouhh, okayy, but the concept Im using just now is right right ?
ghazi
  • ghazi
yep, its right i am sure you'll get your thevnin voltage by that
anonymous
  • anonymous
but I didn't T^T nevermind, i try to use superposition now, thanks :) btw, did u get the Vth ? cause I got the feeling that the answer given is wrong, hahaha
ghazi
  • ghazi
well, Vth, you can use voltage division rule
anonymous
  • anonymous
hold on, currently using superposition to solve it :)
ghazi
  • ghazi
|dw:1356753391535:dw| calculate voltage drop at point a and b
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1356753632924:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh, some text missing ><
ghazi
  • ghazi
actually you are supposed to calculate thevenin voltage across the capacitor that is i guess your load here, so you have to make it open terminal to calculate the voltage drop at load
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah yeahh, that's exactly what I did just now ... n base on your drawing ... we're using nodal analysis ? cause I prefer to find current through capacitor n simply times it, but I don't really know if my concept is right ... there are too many ways to solve this @.@
anonymous
  • anonymous
can I just ignore the terminal 1st, n solve it like a normal question ?
ghazi
  • ghazi
you dont need to go through all that stuff , just use superposition and you are done
anonymous
  • anonymous
T^T, i get the same answer like my previous method ... I guess the answer given is wrong ... but still ... I can't clarify it if Im the only 1 who get this answer ... did you get the same answer as given ?
ghazi
  • ghazi
actually i hate these complex calculation lol so i can write the method you can match it , that is voltage drop due to 20 V source and due to current source
ghazi
  • ghazi
i'll upload the solution and if you are getting same answer then i guess your book has got some mistake, i am not sure but i guess its 4 angle 56 V
anonymous
  • anonymous
hahahahaha, yeaappp, same goes to me, and I wonder who create this stuff, what kind of brain he had -___- but i guess i understand the flow of answering this kind of question, ouhh really ? thanks a lot :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
D: u can guess the answer just by watching it ? awesome ! D:
ghazi
  • ghazi
you are welcome :D and yes the answer is around what i said, but i have to check it again , only reason is i hate this complex calculation lol i'll have to use calculator , dont worry i'll do it :D :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't get it, why we do we have to let V1 - V2 ...
ghazi
  • ghazi
we are finding V1-V2 because just take off the capacitor and you are supposed to find the terminal voltage
anonymous
  • anonymous
soo, deducting v2 by v1 is equal too ... V at terminal ? D: I don't see relation between it, can't even imagine it -_-"
ghazi
  • ghazi
|dw:1356762940423:dw| look here these are V1 and V2
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeap2, but then ... v1 isn't connected with v2 D:
ghazi
  • ghazi
when we measure potential difference we measure the potential difference at two terminals, that is why we have eliminated capacitor it is not needed to be connected to measure the potential drop across those terminals
ghazi
  • ghazi
if like you will join that two points by wire there will be zero potential difference which means both the points at same potential or short circuit
ghazi
  • ghazi
just think of using multimeter for the measurement of potential difference across a resistor or any element , we place two terminals of multimeter at the two ends

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.