A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

aacehm
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it's just as discontinuous as every other point

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Interesting. I'm going with D. Pathological example, though :)

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it is D. I am fairly certain of this. If only I could rationalize my opinion!

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It is obviously not A since the function is defined at some points. It cannot be B or C since each of those functions contain infinitely many discontinuous points. The only reason I say D is because both functions share 0 as a vertex which means the function is continuous at 0.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3The definition of continuity at a point is that there exists a limit as you approach that point, and that the function equals the limit at that point. Both are true for zero. This is an interesting example of a function that is continuous at only one isolated point. Kinda weird sounding, but there you have it.

aacehm
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0in theory it's undefined at zero

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Not it isn't, zero is rational.

experimentX
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm.. foolish of me :)

aacehm
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0you're right, that's weird

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Since 0 is rational, f(x) has a removable discontinuity at 0/3. The point (0, 0) is removable but it defined by the other function. It just so happens that the other function defines f(0) as 0/2 = 0 anyway. This is why I think 0 is continuous.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3Why do you say it has a removable discontinuity?

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If we focus only on f(x) = x/3 if x is irrational, then we would expect 0/3 to be discontinuous since 0 is rational and is not defined.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3But that's not the function. The function is piecewisely defined at every single point. It's never undefined because any point you choose is either rational or irrational.

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But piecewise functions are also discontinuous. In this function, each subfunction has infinitely many points of discontinuity. Combined, however, we obtain the set of all real numbers. x/2 is discontinuous for every irrational (the removed discontinuities lay at x/3) x/3 is discontinuous for every rational (the removed discontinuities lay at x/2) We would expect, then, that when x = 0, the removable discontinuity at x/3 would be found at x/2. It happens that 0/3 = 0/2. Thus the removed discontinuity is found at the same location.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3A removable discontinuity is defined as a point at which a function has a finite limit but the function either does not exist at that point, or it does not equal the limit at that point. Neither of those two things apply here. The function exists at zero, and the limit is zero. It is just good oldfashioned continuous.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3by the function does not exist, I really mean the function is not welldefined.

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You would not agree that f(x) contains two functions containing infinitely many discontinuous points? y = x/2 if x is rational y = x/3 if x is irrational

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3I would completely agree that f(x) has infinitely many irrational points. I disagree that it has a removable discontinuity at 0.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3I'm sorry, discontinuous, not irrational

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ah, yes. I agree that 0 is continuous. My reasoning was that if we focused only on y = x/3 if x is irrational, that line by itself has a discontinuous point at (0, f(0)). However, since 0 is rational, and f(x) = x/2 when x is rational, then f(0) = 0 anyway. f(x) then is continuous at 0. You already said D didn't you ... we are in agreement :D

LogicalApple
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0My brain probably processed the problem incorrectly but resulted in the correct answer.

Jemurray3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3I think your consideration was logical, but it is just very particular to this problem because there are infinitely many irrational points interspersed between rationals and vice versa. Generally speaking, a function is continuous at a if lim f(x) as x>a = f(a), which is perfectly valid here :)
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.