A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 2 years ago
Quantum Mechanics (the very beginning): I was studying the proof of the conservation of ∫ψ²d³r (ψ is the wave function) but I don't understand the following step, in which Gauss's theorem is used.
 2 years ago
Quantum Mechanics (the very beginning): I was studying the proof of the conservation of ∫ψ²d³r (ψ is the wave function) but I don't understand the following step, in which Gauss's theorem is used.

This Question is Closed

peter_pan
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The following integral is performed over the whole space and ψ* is the complex conjugate of ψ: \[\int\limits i \hbar {\partial{ \psi^2} \over \partial t} d^3r =  {\hbar^2 \over 2m} \int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r\] Now, I don't understandthis step \[\int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r =0\] How has the divergence theorem been used?

Carl_Pham
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1You can use the divergence theorem to convert that volume integral to an integral over the boundary surface of the quantity in brackets. However, you set the boundary surface quite far away from any interesting behaviour of your wavefunction, e.g. at infinity, so that either the wavefunction or its gradient, or both, are zero on that boundary. Hence the surface integral is zero.

peter_pan
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, because the wave function must be normalisable and goes to zero at infinity. Thank you for your answer!

Carl_Pham
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Be careful. It only has to be normalizable in the sense that Y>0 at r>inf if it represents a bound state. If it represents a free particle, then it has extent over all space. However, in that case the gradient of the Y is zero. If the wavefunction represents a state with both free character and boundstate character, then fortunately either Y or its gradient goes to zero at infinity. I only mention these technicalities because you're involved in a proof, and a proof is only a proof if it dots every i and crosses every t. But clearly you get the idea.
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.