Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

Quantum Mechanics (the very beginning): I was studying the proof of the conservation of ∫|ψ|²d³r (ψ is the wave function) but I don't understand the following step, in which Gauss's theorem is used.

Physics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
The following integral is performed over the whole space and ψ* is the complex conjugate of ψ: \[\int\limits -i \hbar {\partial{| \psi|^2} \over \partial t} d^3r = - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} \int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi- \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r\] Now, I don't understandthis step \[\int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi- \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r =0\] How has the divergence theorem been used?
You can use the divergence theorem to convert that volume integral to an integral over the boundary surface of the quantity in brackets. However, you set the boundary surface quite far away from any interesting behaviour of your wavefunction, e.g. at infinity, so that either the wavefunction or its gradient, or both, are zero on that boundary. Hence the surface integral is zero.
Yes, because the wave function must be normalisable and goes to zero at infinity. Thank you for your answer!

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Be careful. It only has to be normalizable in the sense that Y->0 at r->inf if it represents a bound state. If it represents a free particle, then it has extent over all space. However, in that case the gradient of the Y is zero. If the wavefunction represents a state with both free character and bound-state character, then fortunately either Y or its gradient goes to zero at infinity. I only mention these technicalities because you're involved in a proof, and a proof is only a proof if it dots every i and crosses every t. But clearly you get the idea.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question