anonymous
  • anonymous
Quantum Mechanics (the very beginning): I was studying the proof of the conservation of ∫|ψ|²d³r (ψ is the wave function) but I don't understand the following step, in which Gauss's theorem is used.
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
The following integral is performed over the whole space and ψ* is the complex conjugate of ψ: \[\int\limits -i \hbar {\partial{| \psi|^2} \over \partial t} d^3r = - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} \int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi- \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r\] Now, I don't understandthis step \[\int\limits \nabla \cdot [ \psi^* \nabla \psi- \psi \nabla \psi^*] d^3r =0\] How has the divergence theorem been used?
anonymous
  • anonymous
You can use the divergence theorem to convert that volume integral to an integral over the boundary surface of the quantity in brackets. However, you set the boundary surface quite far away from any interesting behaviour of your wavefunction, e.g. at infinity, so that either the wavefunction or its gradient, or both, are zero on that boundary. Hence the surface integral is zero.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, because the wave function must be normalisable and goes to zero at infinity. Thank you for your answer!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Be careful. It only has to be normalizable in the sense that Y->0 at r->inf if it represents a bound state. If it represents a free particle, then it has extent over all space. However, in that case the gradient of the Y is zero. If the wavefunction represents a state with both free character and bound-state character, then fortunately either Y or its gradient goes to zero at infinity. I only mention these technicalities because you're involved in a proof, and a proof is only a proof if it dots every i and crosses every t. But clearly you get the idea.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.