Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Claire4christ

  • 3 years ago

I need help with this question. Explain how the example paragraph above illustrates endorsement and why that fallacy makes the argument weak. I play professional basketball, and I gotta have the right equipment to get the job done. Of all the things I need to be at my best, it's my shoes that make or break it for me. After all, I've got to travel up and down that court a hundred times a game. For our city to be at the top of its game, it needs good shoes too, a commuter system that's top notch so our quality workers can get in and out of the city quickly and safely. Less hassle

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Claire4christ
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    plus this Less hassle means more productivity. That's why I encourage you to join me in voting "Yes" on light rail.

  2. beautiful_gurl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    okay... I don't really understand what it's asking...

  3. beautiful_gurl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait nvm hang on

  4. Claire4christ
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    did you read the whole paragraph

  5. beautiful_gurl
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the author repeats themself alot... he doesnt explain much... he's very vague in his descriptions

  6. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy