I need help with this question.
Explain how the example paragraph above illustrates endorsement and why that fallacy makes the argument weak.
I play professional basketball, and I gotta have the right equipment to get the job done. Of all the things I need to be at my best, it's my shoes that make or break it for me. After all, I've got to travel up and down that court a hundred times a game.
For our city to be at the top of its game, it needs good shoes too, a commuter system that's top notch so our quality workers can get in and out of the city quickly and safely. Less hassle
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
plus this Less hassle means more productivity. That's why I encourage you to join me in voting "Yes" on light rail.
okay... I don't really understand what it's asking...