Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

prove if possible (cos x)^n <= cos (nx) if 0 <= x <= pi/2 and 0 < n < 1

I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer


To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

\[\cos^{n} x \le \cos(nx)\]
Not sure if I got this right, but have you used trial numbers?
to test the inequality ?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

I have no clue.
Grade 12 Advanced Functions?
f'(x) - g'(x) > 0 implies f'(x) > g'(x) right? i think i found a method to figure it out
f(x) = cos (nx) g(x) = cos^n(x) f(x) - g(x) = cos (nx) - cos^n(x) if x = 0 then f(x) - g(x) = 0 - 0 =0 this is our starting point, the point at which both functions are equal maybe if we show f'(x) > g'(x) on the interval then that is sufficient to prove the original inequality
I have no clue.
showing (cos(nx))' .>= (cos^n(x))' is sufficient after showing they begin at some point.
Ok so f(x) = cos (nx) f'(x) = -n sin(nx) g(x) = cos^n(x) g'(x) = -n cos^(n-1)(x) * sin x f'(x) > g'(x) implies f'(x) - g'(x) = 0 so . . . if we can show -n sin(nx) - (-n cos^(n-1)(x) * sin x) = \[-n \sin(nx) + n \cos^{n-1}(x) * \sin x > 0\] is true on the interval.. hm
ok .. this becomes \[n \left( -\sin(nx) + \cos^{p - 1}(x) * \sin x \right)\]
\[n \left( -\sin (nx) + \frac{ \sin x }{ \cos^{1 - p} (x) } \right)\] reversing the order of the exponent's difference and putting cos in the denominator
ok since sin is increasing on the interval (0, pi/2), if we focus just on the two sin functions... -sin(nx) + sin x we know that n is fractional, so this portion of the expression will always be positive also we know cos is positive on the interval (0, pi/2) so we can conclude with certainty that -sin(nx) + sin x / cos^(1 - p)(x) > 0 if we multiply this expression by positive n, we will show f'(x) - g'(x) > 0 which is what we set out to prove. seems ok to me
It looks quite ingenious to me! I think p should be n, btw... You have done a good job (yourself, that is...)!
youre right, the question uses p for the exponent but i'm used to n to denote an exponent . or k
wow i should seriously review what i type before i post it. lets just say p = n

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question