anonymous
  • anonymous
prove if possible (cos x)^n <= cos (nx) if 0 <= x <= pi/2 and 0 < n < 1
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\cos^{n} x \le \cos(nx)\]
IsTim
  • IsTim
Not sure if I got this right, but have you used trial numbers?
anonymous
  • anonymous
to test the inequality ?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

IsTim
  • IsTim
I have no clue.
IsTim
  • IsTim
Grade 12 Advanced Functions?
anonymous
  • anonymous
f'(x) - g'(x) > 0 implies f'(x) > g'(x) right? i think i found a method to figure it out
anonymous
  • anonymous
f(x) = cos (nx) g(x) = cos^n(x) f(x) - g(x) = cos (nx) - cos^n(x) if x = 0 then f(x) - g(x) = 0 - 0 =0 this is our starting point, the point at which both functions are equal maybe if we show f'(x) > g'(x) on the interval then that is sufficient to prove the original inequality
IsTim
  • IsTim
I have no clue.
experimentX
  • experimentX
showing (cos(nx))' .>= (cos^n(x))' is sufficient after showing they begin at some point.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok so f(x) = cos (nx) f'(x) = -n sin(nx) g(x) = cos^n(x) g'(x) = -n cos^(n-1)(x) * sin x f'(x) > g'(x) implies f'(x) - g'(x) = 0 so . . . if we can show -n sin(nx) - (-n cos^(n-1)(x) * sin x) = \[-n \sin(nx) + n \cos^{n-1}(x) * \sin x > 0\] is true on the interval.. hm
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok .. this becomes \[n \left( -\sin(nx) + \cos^{p - 1}(x) * \sin x \right)\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[n \left( -\sin (nx) + \frac{ \sin x }{ \cos^{1 - p} (x) } \right)\] reversing the order of the exponent's difference and putting cos in the denominator
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok since sin is increasing on the interval (0, pi/2), if we focus just on the two sin functions... -sin(nx) + sin x we know that n is fractional, so this portion of the expression will always be positive also we know cos is positive on the interval (0, pi/2) so we can conclude with certainty that -sin(nx) + sin x / cos^(1 - p)(x) > 0 if we multiply this expression by positive n, we will show f'(x) - g'(x) > 0 which is what we set out to prove. seems ok to me
ZeHanz
  • ZeHanz
It looks quite ingenious to me! I think p should be n, btw... You have done a good job (yourself, that is...)!
anonymous
  • anonymous
youre right, the question uses p for the exponent but i'm used to n to denote an exponent . or k
anonymous
  • anonymous
wow i should seriously review what i type before i post it. lets just say p = n

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.