At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
For a cubic it is a little more complex because we can have factors like (ax+b) and (ax^2+bx+c).
However, for a cubic, even if there is a factor of the latter kind, then there is a factor of the first. So we can concentrate on factors like (ax+b).
Take an example such as
First check if the coefficients add up to 0, if they don't, then (x-1) is not a factor.
Next change the signs of odd powers (x^3, x, ...) and check again. -1+4-4+3\(\ne\)0, so (x-1) is not a factor.
Since +3 has factor of 1 and 3, and 1 is not a factor, we try next -3
Group the expression as:
(x+3) = x^3+4x^2+4x+3 ....bingo, so we have the factor.
Divide the expression by (x+3) to get (x^2+x+1) as the other factor.
Okay thanks very much. So there is no equivalently simple method as there is for quadratics then it would seem. I just need to go through the bag of tricks until I find a factor and then group it to find the other factors from that? Thanks for your help.
It's almost that.
Sometimes you can try grouping first and get it by trial and error, even for polynomials for the fourth degree. It all depends on how you are used to one technique or the other.
I always try grouping first, because if I get it, it would save a lot of time.