anonymous
  • anonymous
The figure below shows a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC. Ted makes the chart shown below to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC. What is the error in Ted’s proof?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
anonymous
  • anonymous
@amistre64
anonymous
  • anonymous
@ParthKohli

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
@Agent_Sniffles
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok the angel ADP=BCP=30 No =60
phi
  • phi
I think the 3rd line is close but still wrong. the angles inside the equilateral triangle are 60 but the angles he picked out are 90-60= 30 not 60
anonymous
  • anonymous
all other is true
anonymous
  • anonymous
I never really understood proofs..... :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1357766947082:dw| a+c=b+d=90 a=b=60 => c=d=30
anonymous
  • anonymous
So if the 3rd one is wrong, then which answer is it?
anonymous
  • anonymous
for example if you have x=(2+2)/2 you know answer is 2 but you can eliminate as below |dw:1357767118129:dw| so the answer is true but proof is false
phi
  • phi
for these kinds of proofs, showing 2 triangles are congruent, you use one of the standard approaches: SSS, SAS, or ASA knowing that the sides of the triangles are part of a square and an equilateral triangle should be a clue to use SAS (you know 2 sides) or maybe SSS. to use SAS you need to show the angle between the sides are = for this last bit, use the fact that the angles in a square are 90 the angles in an equilateral triangle are 60 can you see how to figure out angle ADP ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Like, if it's 60, then how do we solve the rest?
anonymous
  • anonymous
@phi I don't understand...
anonymous
  • anonymous
you must just proof that the angel ADP=BCP=30 No =60 and it is very easy because 1- every angel on equilateral triangle are equal , and we know sum of angels of triangle is 180, so each angel in equilateral triangle is equal to 60 2-every angel in square are 90, so 90=ADP+PDC=ADP+60 so ADP=30 3- as follow PCB=30 (90-60=30) 4- so Proof is complet
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks!
anonymous
  • anonymous
your welcome
anonymous
  • anonymous
so whats the answer @Sunshine447 ?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.