Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

What is the most misleading aspect of this graph that might lead one to the wrong conclusion? connecting the data points with a line scale of the y-axis scale of the x-axis spacing of the grid (graph attached)

I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer


To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

I'm not sure what it means by "scale of the y-axis," but it's a little confusing that it starts off at .45 seconds instead of zero. So in that, I would select spacing of the grid. Don't take my word for it; it is between B and D.
thanks :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

It is quite confusing that the Y axis starts at some number other than zero. Without a couple dashes in it drawing attention to the discontinuity.
hm i'm not sure
I personally would go with "connecting the data points with a line" and I'll explain why: Four discrete points are plotted which implies that measurements were only taken at those points. Adding lines to this graph implies that many more measurements were taken which contradicts the fact that only 4 measurements were taken.
thank you so much :) can you help me with one more i'm posting now?
I am not in love with connecting the data points either - but I thought they might be OK in this case because measurements are on the same spring. Presumably the spring stretches through all the intermediate points (i.e., the ones on the line) to reach the conformations it's in when it's measured.
I guess that could be true but the restoring force of a string is not linear:\[F=-kx^2\]
err *spring
Ooops...that should have been: \[F=\frac{1}{2}kx^2\] :)
so is that answer correct?
**Agrees** No professional person in their right mind would draw lines through those data points. But the labeling on the Y axis is also lousy. I guess the bottom line is there is much wrong with this picture and it's a subjective decision what's worst.
thank you :) i see now
One sec...let me explain that a bit better. |dw:1358133711277:dw| Drawing the lines in the first graph implies that if you take any point on the line that's where the displacement will be given a pendulum with that period. Now look at the second graph...which could just as easily be the true graph of some spring. Clearly using the graph with the lines is going to be misleading.
That's what I was trying to say :)
thanks so much, the graph was much easier to see it. i understand it much better now :)
At any rate erin, the lines are the problem
no problem!

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question