anonymous
  • anonymous
The rate of decay of a radioactive substance is proportional to the amunt of substance present. Four years ago, there 12 grams of substance. Now there ae 8 grams. How many will there be 8 years from now?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
@zepdrix i think you explained this to me already, but could you please do soagain? i adm still not clear on how to do it.. (
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmm I don't remember these :3 gimme a sec to work through it.
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
|dw:1358381396966:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Ok ok ok so we're dealing with this type of equation right? with the e thingy? ok ok ummm
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmm this one is a little confusing since they're referring back in time and forward... hmmm \[\large y(t)=Ce^{kt}\] So let's call the current time t=0.\[\large y(-4)=12=Ce^{-4k},\qquad y(0)=8=Ce^0\] I'm not sure if this will work, we'll try it though D:
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Let's divide these, \(\huge \frac{y(-4)}{y(0)}\), Which will give usssssss,\[\large \frac{12}{8}=\frac{Ce^{-4k}}{Ce^0}\]Which will simplify to,\[\large \frac{3}{2}=e^{-4k}\]Taking the natural log of both sides gives us,\[\large \ln \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)=-4k\] \[\large k=-\frac{1}{4}\ln \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)\]
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
So we solved for \(k\). Let's plug it back into our equation and solve for \(C\).\[\huge 12=Ce^{-4\left(-\frac{1}{4}\ln \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)\right)}\]Which simplifies to,\[\large 12=Ce^{\ln\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)}\]And then,\[\large 12=C\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)\]And thennnnnn,\[\large C=8\]
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmm I don't think I'm doing this correctly :c I think we have to let t=0 be the starting point, not the current time... I'm just not sure if it's going to work out doing it this way.
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Do you happen to know the answer before I go too far along this path? XD
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
So I can determine if this is the right way or not.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thank you so much :) but i think my teacher said that the answer was 18.... o.o
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Ok lemme punch it in and see if we're on the right track.
anonymous
  • anonymous
okay ^-^
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmmm No I got like 3.6. Darn I did something wrong :C oh well..
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh wait. 3.6 might be the answer. i'm not exactly sure if it's 18 or 3.6. i think i heard someone saying that it's 3.6.. i'm not sure... gosh, can i see the work you did to get 3.6 as the answer???? :O
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
lol :O
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
So we solved for C, we solved for k, giving us the following equation,\[\huge y(t)=8e^{\left(-\frac{1}{4}\ln\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)\right)t}\] If you plug in t=8, you'll get 3.6
anonymous
  • anonymous
ahh.. i';; need some time to understand this. haha but thank you alwayssss :) *

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.