Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

swiftskier96

43. What is the solution of the system of equations? 2x + 2y + 3z = -6 3x + 5y + 4z = 3 2x + 3y + 4z = -10

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @phi I forgot how to do this. Can you help?

    • one year ago
  2. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @ghazi

    • one year ago
  3. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    elimination is the technique

    • one year ago
  4. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    are you allowed a calculator?

    • one year ago
  5. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yeah i have one.

    • one year ago
  6. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    then the best way is just "brute force" write down just the numbers keeping the same order 2 2 3 -6 3 5 4 3 2 3 4 -10

    • one year ago
  7. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    the idea is we want the first column to have zeros below the first 2 (call 2 in 1st row, 1st col the pivot) (that means we will zero out the 3 and the 2 beneath it) to zero out the 3 in the 2nd row we do this: calculate -3/pivot (in other words, -3/2= -1.5) and save this number call the number the "factor" so I can talk about it. now for each number in the 2nd row: multiply the factor times the number in the 1st row, and add it to the number in the 2nd row. write down the answer Here is what I mean for the 2nd row the factor is -3/2. multiply -3/2 * 2 (the 1st number in row 1) and add it to 3 (1st # in row 2) we get 0 now multiply -3/2 * 2 (2nd # in 1st row) and add it to 5 (2nd # in 2nd row). we get 2 multiply -3/2 * 3 (3rd # in 1st row) and add it to 4 (3rd # in 2nd row). we get -0.5 finally, multiply -3/2 *-6 and add it to 3 we get 9+3= 12 these numbers are our new 2nd row. So far we have 2 2 3 -6 0 2 -0.5 12 2 3 4 -10

    • one year ago
  8. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    now we do the same thing for row 3. still use 2 in the first row as the pivot, calculate the factor for the bottom row: it is -2/pivot or -1 can you figure out what the bottom row becomes?

    • one year ago
  9. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So i take the first number on the bottom row (2) and multiply it by the factor (-2/-1)?

    • one year ago
  10. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    This is complicated. The factor is the # we want to zero out (2 in the bottom) row divided by minus the pivot. the pivot is the first # in the 1st row. It is 2. -pivot is -2. the factor is 2 (bottom row)/-2 or -1 the factor is -1 Now multiply the factor times each number in the pivot row (1st row) and add to the number in the bottom row. Does that make sense?

    • one year ago
  11. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yeah that makes more sense. Ill figure it out here. One sec...

    • one year ago
  12. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    In the 3rd row we'd have -2 -3 -4 10.

    • one year ago
  13. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you multiplied the bottom row by the factor. what you want to do is multiply the pivot row by the factor then add that result to the bottom row you know you are on the right track if the first # in the answer is 0 so multiply the 1st row by -1 add these new numbers to the 3rd row. what do you get?

    • one year ago
  14. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ohhh ok. I got 0 1 1 -4

    • one year ago
  15. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes, so now the numbers look like this 2 2 3 -6 0 2 -0.5 12 0 1 1 -4 notice that the 1st column has zeros except to the 2. we now move to the 2nd row to its first non-zero and call that the pivot row 2 is the pivot row. its first not zero is the 2. 2 is the new pivot. we want to zero out the 1 in the 3rd row. Find the factor: #/-pivot can you tell me the factor?

    • one year ago
  16. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So are you saying that i should take the 1 in the 3rd row and divide it by the pivot (2)?

    • one year ago
  17. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    almost, the factor is the 1 in the 3rd row (it is the number just below the pivot) but divide by minus the pivot.

    • one year ago
  18. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Sorry, im confused. What does divide by minus the pivot mean? Are you saying that the pivot should be negative?

    • one year ago
  19. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I am saying when we want the factor (for the row we are working on) we take the number in the row (1 in this case) and divide by minus the pivot. (pivot is 2, minus the pivot is -2) the factor is going to be 1 / -2

    • one year ago
  20. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, the factor is -0.5 now multiply the factor times the pivot row add those numbers to the 3rd row. this will be the new 3rd row. what do you get ?

    • one year ago
  21. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So id do -0.5 * 0, -0.5 * 2, -0.5 * -0.5, and -0.5 * 12. That would be 0 -1 0.25 -6. Then i add those numbers to the 3rd row which would make the 3rd row 0 0 1.25 -10

    • one year ago
  22. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    perfect

    • one year ago
  23. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yesss! Lol

    • one year ago
  24. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The numbers look like this 2 2 3 -6 0 2 -0.5 12 0 0 1.25 -10 now remember we left out the variables. Let's look at just the bottom row and put back the variables: 0x + 0y + 1.25z = -10 0 times x and 0 times y are both 0 so what we really have is 1.25z= -10 can you solve for z ?

    • one year ago
  25. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yesh i can! 1.25z/1.25 = -10/1.25 z = -8

    • one year ago
  26. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    what we are doing is called "back substitution". We work backwards (or upwards) the 2nd row is 0 2 -0.5 12 with variables (and leaving out the 0) 2y -0.5*z = 12 The first thing to do is replace z with its value -8 2y -0.5* -8 =12 can you solve for y ?

    • one year ago
  27. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    -0.5 * -8 = 4 So would it be 2y - 4 = 12 or 2y + 4 = 12?

    • one year ago
  28. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if you get confused about signs, don't use subtraction. I think 3-2 as 3 + -2 (three plus a minus 2) so the equation 2y -0.5* -8 =12 I think of as 2y + (-0.5* -8) =12

    • one year ago
  29. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I really should have written as 2y + -0.5z = 12 in the first place

    • one year ago
  30. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ok. So it would be 2y + 4 = 12 2y + 4 - 4 = 12 - 4 2y = 8 2y/2 = 8/2 y = 4

    • one year ago
  31. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes. Do you want to tackle the first row ?

    • one year ago
  32. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Sure, ill try. The first row is 2 2 3 -6. So it would be 2x + (2 + 3) = -6 right?

    • one year ago
  33. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Or is it 2x + (2*3) = -6?

    • one year ago
  34. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    don't skip steps. Put back in the variables y and z

    • one year ago
  35. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    remember each row has the variables, we just left them out because we don't calculate with them until this last "back substitution"

    • one year ago
  36. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh right. So 2 2 3 -6 becomes 2x + 2(4) + 3(-8) = -6?

    • one year ago
  37. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes, but I would write it as 2x + 2y + 3z = -6 first, then write it as 2x + 2(4) + 3(-8) = -6 (until I did a few more problems).

    • one year ago
  38. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Just to help remember what is going on

    • one year ago
  39. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ok. So that would look like 2x + 8 + (-24) = -6 2x + (-16) = -6 2x + (-16) - (-16) = -6 - (-16) 2x = 10 2x/2 = 10/2 x = 5

    • one year ago
  40. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, so that is the answer: x=5, y=4, z=-8 A bit painful, but 3 equations and 3 unknowns are painful when you do them by hand. If you have the energy,see if you can redo the first column on your own. I gave the steps, but it may have been as clear as mud the first time through.

    • one year ago
  41. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ok. Will do. Thanks for all the help! That was a really hard question to go through!

    • one year ago
  42. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The good news is this technique works for any size, 2 x 2 upto big x big (where big is as many numbers as you want to think about). These days computers solve 1,000,000 by 1,000,000 or even bigger....

    • one year ago
  43. swiftskier96
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Man... That would take a really long time to solve... O_O

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.