anonymous
  • anonymous
Which equation describes the four ordered pairs (-1,-3), (0,1), (2,9), (3,13)? A. y=2x+1 B. y=4x+1 C. y=4x-1 D. y=2x-1
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
B
anonymous
  • anonymous
B
Callisto
  • Callisto
Explanations?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
put the values of x and y in the equations and find in which case 4 of them are satisfying the equation.
kirbykirby
  • kirbykirby
Or there's a more systematic way of doing it:
kirbykirby
  • kirbykirby
They give you the point (0,1) which is |dw:1358396550543:dw| your y-intercept in the formula y = mx+b, so b = 1 Now for the slope, take two points and calculate it using the slope formula: If we take points (-1,-3) and (0,1):\[m=\frac{(-3)-(1)}{(-1)-(0)}= \frac{-4}{-1}=4\] So, y = 4x+1
kirbykirby
  • kirbykirby
(And I guess you can assume the other points are valid for this equation since there is no option such as "none of the above")
kirbykirby
  • kirbykirby
What sritama told you is perfectly valid as well, but perhaps a bit more time consuming

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.