Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

dietrich_harmon

  • 3 years ago

Give the missing reasons in this proof of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. Given: Prove:

  • This Question is Closed
  1. dietrich_harmon
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  2. dietrich_harmon
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  3. dietrich_harmon
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  4. dietrich_harmon
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  5. mathstudent55
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1. When a transversal intersects two lines, two angles on the same side of the transversal and both on the same relative side of the two lines are called corresponding angles. If the lines are parallel, corresponding angles are congruent. For example, angles 1 and 5 are corresponding, and bec the lines are parallel, they are congruent. 2. Angles such as 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Vertical angles are congruent. 3. Also, let's say <A is congr to <B, and <B is congr to <C, then <A is congr to <C by transitive property of congruence. These three points I made are hints as to what you need to do to get the reasons you need.

  6. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy