A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
dietrich_harmon
 3 years ago
Give the missing reasons in this proof of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem.
Given:
Prove:
dietrich_harmon
 3 years ago
Give the missing reasons in this proof of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. Given: Prove:

This Question is Closed

mathstudent55
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.01. When a transversal intersects two lines, two angles on the same side of the transversal and both on the same relative side of the two lines are called corresponding angles. If the lines are parallel, corresponding angles are congruent. For example, angles 1 and 5 are corresponding, and bec the lines are parallel, they are congruent. 2. Angles such as 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Vertical angles are congruent. 3. Also, let's say <A is congr to <B, and <B is congr to <C, then <A is congr to <C by transitive property of congruence. These three points I made are hints as to what you need to do to get the reasons you need.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.