At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

But that is like a convention because there is no x to make TRUE the statement.

Sorry, can anyone just tell me what \(\rm P(x)\) stands for?

I do know that conditional is not equivalent to \(\rm if\cdots then\) statements.

Oh, I get it.

if you give x the value -1 you can say that the proposition is FALSE.

If \(x \in \emptyset\), we know that \(P(x)\) is true so the conditional is true.

So the statement is always true, and it is given in your original statement that it is true.

Two statements having the same truth tables are equivalent.

Then can I turn every universal quantification into an implication?

yes you can

generally speaking
\[\forall x \in X, P(x)\]
is equivalent to
\[(x \in X) \rightarrow P(x)\]