Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Nodata
Group Title
Why \[\forall x \in \emptyset: P(x)\] is equivalent to \[x\in \emptyset \Rightarrow P(x)\]?
 one year ago
 one year ago
Nodata Group Title
Why \[\forall x \in \emptyset: P(x)\] is equivalent to \[x\in \emptyset \Rightarrow P(x)\]?
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

binarymimic Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3
it's just how mathematicians/logicians write things down. it's a matter of notation, and nothing more. they both state the same thing in a different way. they both claim that for any x in the empty set, P(x) is true another trivial example, what if we said: E = the set of all even numbers P(x) = "x + 2 is in E" and we made this claim: For all even numbers e in E, e + 2 is in E. \[\forall e \in E, P(e)\] see how this is an equivalent statement to: "if e is in E, then e + 2 is in E" \[(e \in E) \rightarrow P(e)\]
 one year ago

UnkleRhaukus Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
\[\begin{array}{ccc}\hline\phi&\psi&\phi\Rightarrow\psi\\\hline T&T&T\\T&F&F\\F&T&T\\F&F&T\\\hline\end{array}\]\[\begin{array}{cccc}\hline \forall x \in \emptyset:P(x)&x\in\emptyset &P(x)& x\in\emptyset \Rightarrow P(x)\\\hline T&T&T&T\\\hline\end{array}\]
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.