Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

More help with l'hospital's rule: can I evaluate a problem using l'hospital's rule when the following condition exists: lim(x-->infinity) (xe^(1/x)-x)

I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Sorry, the condition, after I worked the problem is -1/infinity
no, L'Hopital's can be applied only if you have the form 0/0 or \(\infty\)/\(\infty\) so, what you can do is, (xe^(1/x)-x) =x( (e^(1/x)-1)) = (e^(1/x)-1) / (1/x) now its 0/0 form and you can apply L'Hopitals.
you get a form infinity - infinity which is undefined

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Thank you, I set it up differently :(
Also, aren't there other conditions for l'hospital's? For example 1^infinity?
if you have 1^infinity form, you can apply log to both sides to get 0/0 form, but there are other ways to deal with 1^infinity form also.
for L'Hopital's , only 0/0 or infinity/infinity should be there.
You can only apply L'Hopital's rule when you have the form \[0/0\] or \[\infty/\infty\]. When you have 1^infinity, you usually transform your by using ln (natural log) on both sides of your equation (set your limit as y = lim... blabla) then ln both sides
I got infinity over infinity when I worked that problem, how did you get zero over zero?
i meant 0/0 or infinity / infinity ...any one of the form you can get...
I know, but after evaluating the above problem, I got -infinity/infinity, you said you got 0/0
How did you work it differently?
oh, 1/x =0, e^0 =1 1-1=0 <--numerator 1/x=0 <--denom.
You are right! Thank you!!
Thanks for the help. Keep your eyes peeled, I may need help differentiating it. Soon. I'll close this for now and open a new one if I need help differentiating it.
(e^(1/x)-1) / (1/x)\[\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{e^{1/x}-1}{\frac{1}{x}}= \frac{\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}e^{1/x}-1}{\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{x}}=\frac{e^{1/\infty}-1}{\frac{1}{\infty}}=\frac{e^0-1}{0}=0/0\]
ok, sure :)
Thanks Kirby!
one tip, before differentiating, substitute x =1/y so, that y-->0 then diff. num and denom. seperately. it'll much easier than to diff. by x.
What? Why? I don't understand your tip at all... does infinity equal 1/0?
It's the limit as x->0 of 1/x ... it's different than just "1/x" where x=0
yes, it does.
x---> infinity x is very very large but not equal to infinity 1/x will be very very small, but not =0 -----> 1/x->0
As you go towards x->0 on the x-axis, you approach infinity because there is an asymptote at x=0. So, the graph is continuously stretching out infinitely along the asymptote
It's hard for me to visualize. Why is that fraction easier to use than just x as it approaches infinity?
So I have (-e^(1/x)/x^2)/-(1/x^2), which, using l'hospital's rule gives me 0/0. I differentiate that and I have
x->0 from the right obviously, it approaches +infinity, but -infinity if it approaches 0 from the left
1/infinity... which is zero, what do you think? Am I differentiating it correctly?
see, if you differentiate directly, you'll need to differentiate, 1/x in the denominator, which will give you -1/x^2 , which again will be 0 for x->infinity. BUT, if you put y=1/x you'll have y in the denominator, and differentiating y will give u 1. got the point ?
no... give me a second for my brain to process this
Yeah, I don't see how putting zero in a denominator will ever give me one?
if y is approaching zero, that is, and is in the denominator
'putting zero in a denominator ' ??
you said I should use y--->0 instead of 1/x as x---> infinity. If I plug y in my denominator, then I'll have zero.
I'm supposing I actually have Zero idea what you're talking about... in the numerator
wait, did you try differentiating without any substitution ? then you'll see what problems arise. then you put 1/x = y.
I tried differentiating and I wound up with 1/infinity, which is zero. I'm wondering if I got it or if I botched it., you don't get 1/ your steps....
okay. I have to differentiate (-e^(1/x)/X^2)/(1/(x^2))
I get -e^(1/x)/(x^2) * -x^2
that gives me -e^(1/x)/x^2 * -1
I'm waiting
(-e^(1/x)/X^2)/(1/(x^2))= -e^(1/x)
numerator = e^(1/x) -1 ---> (-1/x^2) e^(1/x) denominator =1/x ------> (-1/x^2) overall = e^(1/x) yeah...
so I do that before I differentiate
you got (-1/x^2) e^(1/x) and (-1/x^2) after differentiating only...
and then you can directly put 1/x = 0, e^0=1
so I have 1/0, or indeterminate?
you have 1 in the denominator now...not 0
got it, so my answer is 1!
vunderbar! so I shouldn't have differentiated in the first place.
I just evaluated it wrong. You are amazing. Who are you? Thanks a million!
i am just another helper, glad i could help :) welcome ^_^

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question