Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
seidi.yamauti
Group Title
A ball with mass m and velocity v hits a wall, and suffers an elastic colision. So it comes back vith velocity v (1 dimension motion).
Since linear momentum must be conserved, it means the wall has a momentum p=2mv after the ball comes back. How can we prove it?
(mv=mv+2mv)
 one year ago
 one year ago
seidi.yamauti Group Title
A ball with mass m and velocity v hits a wall, and suffers an elastic colision. So it comes back vith velocity v (1 dimension motion). Since linear momentum must be conserved, it means the wall has a momentum p=2mv after the ball comes back. How can we prove it? (mv=mv+2mv)
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

Outkast3r09 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
\[p_1+p_2=p_3+p_4\] \[m_1v_1+m_2(0)=m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}\] \[m_1v_1=m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}\] \[v_{1f}=v_1\] \[m_1v_1=m_1v_1+m_2v_{2f}\] \[m_1v_1+m_1v_1=m_2v_{2f}\] \[2m_1v_1=m_2v_{2f}\]
 one year ago

Outkast3r09 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
I just find this problem a little silly because that wall is going to instantly stop after it's hit (unless this is a gigantic ball.) i guess you can see this as a wrecking ball hitting a wall.
 one year ago

Outkast3r09 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
more obvious if you think of it as a gigantic ball hitting a smaller wall
 one year ago

seidi.yamauti Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Was it? hahaha I guess that is fine, since linear momentum must be conserved. But it was a question by professor Walter Lewin, in 8.01 (MIT Physics), that he wanted his students to think about. I gonna watch it again and see if that was what he was asking for... At the moment it seemed as a brain teaser. Anyway, thanks haha. The question is really silly...
 one year ago

seidi.yamauti Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So, i guess the question is 'how can the wall have momentum and yet no kinect energy (since m=infinity and thus v=0)?"  an ideal case What is the meaning of this?
 one year ago

VincentLyon.Fr Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
I haven't seen the video, but I think the important fact here is that whereas momentum varies in v, kinetic energy varies in v². If mass of wall M is much greater than mass of ball m, then MV will be finite, whereas MV²/2 will be infinitesimal.
 one year ago

sanchit138 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
momentum is conserved if no external force is applied on the system.in this case i believe an external force is present
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.