Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

method of least squares fit, y=Bx to the following n=6 points (3,4),(1,2),(5,4),(6,8),(3,6),(4,5) and it has to go through the origin can someone help me get started?

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
Did you answer the question last night? \(\sum{xy} = B\cdot\sum{x^{2}}\) Have you seen it? Can you create it?
you have to minimize the B right?
how did you already get the summation etc without minimazing and taking derivatives?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

No, you are minimizing the error. You must select the B that accomplishes this task.
You are asking good questions. This suggests that you have seen the development of Normal Equations.
\(I(B) = \left(y - Bx\right)^{2}\) Find \(\dfrac{dI}{dB}\).
2x(y-Bx)?
I don't get how did you get the summation equation that you posted, i know how to solve it from there, but how did you figured it out so fast
Negative x?
It doesn't matter, in this case. I just wanted to check to see that you had it right and were moving on.
the question is if there is other way to coming up with the equation to the problem you came up with, instead of going through the minimalization formula then partial derivative =0
Well, there are some Matrix methods, but I'm guessing we don't want to talk about those, today. You have it just fine, excepting that this is a one-parameter derivation so it's just a Derivative, not a Partial Derivative. -2x(y-Bx) = 0 leads to what?
-2xy-2bx^2 =0
-2xy+Bx^2=0 sorry
2Bx^2=+2xy B=2xy/2x^2 B=xy/x^2
ii see it now
More importantly, \(xy = Bx^{2}\). Resist the temptation to solve for B. If you've more than one parameter, you WILL become confused. Reach for the standard Normal Equation form.
i am not really familiar with Normal Equation yet
Pretty much just: 1) Everything without a parameter on one side, and 2) Everything with a parameter on the other side - in ascending Order of the terms.
Solving for y = a + bx comes out: y = a + bx yx = ax + bx^2 For example.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question