- baldymcgee6

Use an inverse trig substitution on the integral...

- jamiebookeater

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- baldymcgee6

|dw:1358909488344:dw|

- abb0t

For inverse trig function, you want to get it into a form that looks like arctan, arcsin, arcos, etc.,
The first step is to complete the square.

- baldymcgee6

complete the square in the denominator... okkkk

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- baldymcgee6

you're going to have to refresh my memory on how to do that :/

- baldymcgee6

|dw:1358910770499:dw|

- abb0t

\[ax^2+bx+c \]
\[(\frac{ b }{ 2 })^2 \]

- baldymcgee6

i'm sorry, i forget what to do...

- abb0t

divide by two and square the answer of the 2nd term (b).

- abb0t

then add it to C.

- baldymcgee6

|dw:1358910964480:dw|

- abb0t

Yeah. Now, you can factor it to get something that looks like an inverse trig, so that you get: \[(x \pm a)^2 + 1\]
where you will tell what inverse trig function you have. Try it.

- abb0t

Essentially, you might need to do more work, like factor out a number or two. But remember that you have it in a square root! so I think it might be arcos? Just a guess. It wont be arctan since arctan does;t have a square root.

- baldymcgee6

|dw:1358914184400:dw|@abb0t

- abb0t

Now use u-substitution.

- baldymcgee6

of what?

- baldymcgee6

u - x-1 ?

- abb0t

yeah

- baldymcgee6

u = x-1 ***

- baldymcgee6

i don't see where that takes us.

- baldymcgee6

|dw:1358914405152:dw|

- baldymcgee6

@zepdrix ?

- zepdrix

Let's not do a U-sub, that seems rather unnecessary.
We'll already be doing a trig sub, so it's better if we can limit the number of substitutions that we apply.
Your factoring looks good.
So we're at this point.\[\large \int\limits\frac{dx}{\left[2(x-1)^2-3\right]^{3/2}}\]

- zepdrix

Ok this next part is going to be a little tricky to understand, let me see if I can put it into the right words.
There are 3 primary forms that we look for when making a trig sub.
We'll look at the one that specifically applies to this problem.
Ignore the 2 coefficient on X in the bottom for a moment.
Our intention is to get rid of the addition or subtraction in the bottom.
If we can do that, simplify it down to ONE term, we can easily apply the exponent on the outside to it.
If we see:\[\large x^2-a^2\]We want to let \(\large x=a\sec \theta\)
That will do this for us,\[\large x^2-a^2 \qquad \rightarrow \qquad a^2\sec^2 \theta-a^2 \qquad \rightarrow \qquad a^2(\sec^2\theta-1)\]
From there, we can recall that \(\large \sec^2\theta-1=tan^2\theta\) and make the switch.
\[\large a^2(\tan^2\theta)\]
Now you might be saying, "But zep! We don't have an a^2! We just have a 3!"
Well baldy this is where it gets a little tricky.
We need to get that ugly 2 off of our x term.\[\large \int\limits\limits\frac{dx}{\left[2\left((x-1)^2-\dfrac{3}{2}\right)\right]^{3/2}}\]

- zepdrix

"But zep! We still don't have a nice \(a\) value!"
Well that's just the way it works out sometimes.
We DO have an \(a\), it's just a little ugly :D
So in our case, our \(a\) value is going to be \(\dfrac{\sqrt3}{\sqrt2}\).

- zepdrix

We'll make the following substitution,
\[\large (x-1)=\frac{\sqrt3}{\sqrt2}\sec \theta\]
So our denominator will do something like this,
\[\large \left[2\left(\color{salmon}{(x-1)^2}-\dfrac{3}{2}\right)\right]^{3/2} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \left[2\left(\color{salmon}{\frac{3}{2}\sec^2\theta}-\frac{3}{2}\right)\right]^{3/2}\]

- zepdrix

\[\large \left[3\left(\sec^2\theta-1\right)\right]^{3/2} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \left[3\left(\tan^2\theta\right)\right]^{3/2}\]Which simplifies to,\[\large \sqrt{27}\tan^3 \theta\]

- zepdrix

Giving us an integral of,\[\large \frac{1}{\sqrt{27}}\int\limits\frac{dx}{\tan^3\theta}\]From here, we'll still need to deal with the dx.

- zepdrix

\[\large (x-1)=\frac{\sqrt3}{\sqrt2}\sec \theta \qquad \rightarrow \qquad dx=\frac{\sqrt3}{\sqrt2}\sec\theta\tan\theta \; d \theta\]
So our integral becomes,\[\large \frac{1}{\sqrt{27}}\cdot\frac{\sqrt3}{\sqrt2}\int\limits\limits\frac{\sec \theta \tan \theta \; d \theta}{\tan^3\theta}\]

- zepdrix

So from here, cancel out a couple of tangents.
Then convert everything to sines and cosines.
At that point you'll have a couple options.
You can do a nice easy U-sub,
Or
You can write your terms as \(\cot\theta \csc\theta\) which is a fairly easy integral.

- zepdrix

There a bit more to be done to get through this.
But I'm tired, and you're offline anyway XD lol.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.