anonymous
  • anonymous
Can someone clearly explain to me what i need to do and why I am doing this?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Callisto @Mertsj @NotTim @phi @satellite73 @UnkleRhaukus
anonymous
  • anonymous
It's a matrix problem.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3&6&9\\0&-3&7\\0&-1&-1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\-7 \end{array}\right]\] \[\sim\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3&6&9\\0&-3&7\\(0-0)&(-3--3)&(-1-7)\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\(-7-1) \end{array}\right]\qquad R_3\to R_3-R_2\] \[\sim\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3&6&9\\0&-3&7\\0&0&-8\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\-8 \end{array}\right]\] \[\sim\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3&6&9\\0&-3&7\\0&0&-8/-8\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\-8/-8 \end{array}\right]\qquad R_3\to R_3/-8\] \[\sim\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3&6&9\\0&-3&7\\0&0&1\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}1\\1\\1 \end{array}\right]\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok so our goal is to make the second box or matrix or whatever you wanna call it, be the same?
anonymous
  • anonymous
and what does REF and RREF mean??
amistre64
  • amistre64
reduced echelon form and row reduced echelon form echelon just means "stairs"
amistre64
  • amistre64
Unkles 3rd line is REF RREF has leading 1s
anonymous
  • anonymous
btw that doesn't seem to be the right anwer
anonymous
  • anonymous
its cause @UnkleRhaukus has 7 instead of -7
amistre64
  • amistre64
multiply the 2nd row by -1 and add it to the 3rd row to get a new thrid row and a matrix in ref
amistre64
  • amistre64
the object is to get rid of that -3 in the 2nd column of the last row
amistre64
  • amistre64
(0 -3 -7 1) *-1 0 3 7 -1 0 -3 -1 -7 ---------- 0 0 6 -8 new 3rd
anonymous
  • anonymous
why is that the goal? we want everything under the bridge we draw to equal zero?
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1359151416530:dw| this is what i mean by bridge ^^^^
anonymous
  • anonymous
If your matrix gets that form then you can easily solve for for the three unknowns. When you look at the last row, you see that there is a direct relation for the third unknown (lets call it x3): 6*x3 = -8. Now that x3 is known, there is a direct relation for the second unknown and after that for the first.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok i still dont understand the goal of this....
anonymous
  • anonymous
like the purpose of changing the last row
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you don't change the last row, then you need to calculate x2 and x3 from the two last equations (2 equations, two unknowns). If you do change it, then one of the unknowns is directly given (the last row does not depend on x2 and x1 as the first two values in the matrix are zero).
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
i see i did copy the question incorrectly, that seven on the second row should be a negative like you say @mariomintchev. so the working/solution will be a bit different , However the method will be the same, The basic idea is that a matrix is a simpler way of representing an system of equations, performing row operations does not change the solution to the system. We choose row operations that reduce the complicated system by merging information in different rows, row echelon form is when we have zeroes below the main diagonal( or bridge) and ones as the first terms in each row. from REF we usually continue to Reduced row echelon form because then the solution can be easily be read off say \[\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&0&1 \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}8\tfrac16\\12\tfrac12\\-5\tfrac12 \end{array}\right]\] which is kinda shorthand for\[\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&0&0&x_1\\0&1&0&x_2\\0&0&1&x_3 \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}8\tfrac16\\12\tfrac12\\-5\tfrac12 \end{array}\right]\] which equivalent to\[x_1+0+0=8\tfrac16\]\[0+x_2+0=12\tfrac12\]\[0+0+x_3=-5\tfrac12\] which is the solution to the system
amistre64
  • amistre64
matrix setups are just another way of organizing the data. The elementary row operations on a matrix are the same technique/construct as working an system of equation using "elimination" method.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.