Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Sarah_Miller720
Group Title
Suppose U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} is the universal set and P = {1, 2, 3, 4}. What is P'?
 one year ago
 one year ago
Sarah_Miller720 Group Title
Suppose U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} is the universal set and P = {1, 2, 3, 4}. What is P'?
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

Sarah_Miller720 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
i forgot how to do this stuff so i need some help :)
 one year ago

Sarah_Miller720 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
my choices. {5, 6, 7, 8} {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} {1, 2, 3, 4} cannot be determined
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
well the first thing is that a universal set contains all sets including itself. for most set axiomatics you must know that such set does not exists, because of a paradox. Although there are some set axiomatics for which it exists
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Also for it be the universal set you can't say it has just 8 elements :D this is just plain not right
 one year ago

JayDS Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Universal meaning "everything" so it must be everything inside P and also U.
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
if we say that U is just a set(not the universal one) then we can say that P is a proper subset of U
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
If a universal set exists, it's not a countable set. You should check out some set theory. It's cool.
 one year ago

JayDS Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Universal meaning "everything" so it must be everything inside P and also U, excluding any reptitions.
 one year ago

JayDS Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
lol, u know ur theory stuff @mivanov , seems like u need to teach me some :)
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So you can't just list it's elements casually like that :D. And for most set theory axiomathics such set does not exists because of a simple paradox anyway.
 one year ago

Sarah_Miller720 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So since i need everything then my answer would be{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} right?
 one year ago

JayDS Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
yes u are right.
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
thank you. Well there are 3 types of sets > countably finite ex. {a,b,c} it has 3 elements because we can have bijective function f: {1,2,3} > {a,b,c} that is for each element we can numerate it with a natural number. and the set {1,2,3} is the set of all numbers bellow or equal to 3. Second we have countably infinite sets. Imagine A is a set. If we can have a function f: N > A such that it's bijective,(for each element of A there is unique element from N and the opposite is true as well) we call the set countably infinite. And last we have sets which are countably infinite. Example is the set of all subsets of the natural numbers. Such a set is called a power set. Namely for N it's writen P(N). The proofs of these statements aren't that long, if you are interested you can look around and read them.
 one year ago

mivanov Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
and if a universal set P exists, then we have that P is an element of P, also any elements composed of empty sets. Because the empty set is a subset of every set. Example we would have that {empty set} is an element of P, {{empty set}}, basically it has an infinite number of elements, and can't be comprehended easily. Also it leads to a paradox, because we have another axiom that tells us that for each property E(x) exists a set A for which the elements of A posses that property. It's called the Russel paradox.
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.