anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm having trouble doing this question... (3K-5)x^2+Kx+1=0 For what value of K will this quadratic equation have no real roots, one real root, or two real roots? Answer as an inequality if necessary.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
ZeHanz
  • ZeHanz
This is a quadratic equation: ax²+bx+c=0. The discriminant, D=b²-4ac tells you about the number of real roots: D > 0: 2 real roots, D = 0: 1 real root, D < 0, no real roots. You probably know all this already ;) You just have to see that in your own equation a=3K-4, b=K and c=1. Put these values for a, b and c in the formula for D and solve the above three cases for K.
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's as far as I went. As i was solving for no real roots i got stuck at this: |dw:1359306176821:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1359306307751:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

phi
  • phi
what you get is (k-2)(k-10) < 0 this expression is less than 0 if it is negative. it is negative if one of the factors is + and the other is negative
phi
  • phi
so you try (k-2)< 0 and k-10>0 --> k<2 and k>10 can not happen or k-2 > 0 and k-10 < 0 ---> k>2 and k<10 or 2 < k < 10
anonymous
  • anonymous
whoa whoa whoa where did you (k-2)(k-10) from?
phi
  • phi
k^2 -12k+20 < 0 factor into (k-2)(k-10) < 0
ZeHanz
  • ZeHanz
First, you get: K²-12K+20<0 This is the same as (K-2)(K-10)<0. It equals 0 if K = 2 or K=10. For other values of K it will be positive or negative. If you try K=0 (very simple to do), you get a positive number. To get a negative outcome, you therefore have to have 2
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait lemme try the other 2 first.
phi
  • phi
You used "completing the square" to find the roots of K²-12K+20=0 you got k=2 and k= 10 which implies k-2=0 and k-10= 0 this means you could write the quadratic as (k-2)(k-10) (in case you could not factor the quadratic)
anonymous
  • anonymous
NOW I am confused. |dw:1359306861746:dw|
phi
  • phi
there are two k values that result in 1 real root (a "repeated" root)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Then they are both answers? Shouldn't be happening though.
phi
  • phi
Don't get confused. There are two k values that result in a quadratic: x^2+2x+1 =0 5x^2 +10x +1 =0 each has one 1 (repeated) root.
phi
  • phi
**25x^2 + 10 x + 1
anonymous
  • anonymous
Then do I put 2 or 10 for the answer?
phi
  • phi
For what value of K will this quadratic equation have one real root? K=2 or K=10
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ohhhh I see.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait let me try the third and last one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1359307404608:dw| |dw:1359307505574:dw|
phi
  • phi
we use the same idea (k-2)(k-10) > 0 > 0 means the expression is positive (things that are positive are > 0) to be +, both terms must be + or both terms must be - let's first do both positive: k-2>0 and k-10>0 --> k>2 and k>10 both conditions have to be true, so k>10 is the answer now both terms are - k-2<0 and k-10<0 --> k<2 and k<10 Both must be true, so k<2 works
anonymous
  • anonymous
So you take the bigger one of the two and forge an equation from the two?
phi
  • phi
ask again, I don't understand the question.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So I take the bigger inequalities from both the positive and the negative trials and put them together? Like take the bigger one from k>2 / k>10 and k<2 / k<10? In which case 2>k>10?
phi
  • phi
I would not write it 2>k>10 (you only use this notation if k is between 2 and 10) in this case k<2 results in quadratics with 2 real roots and k>10 results in quadratics with 2 real roots I would say For what value of K will this quadratic equation have 2 real roots? for K<2 or k>10
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ohhh. So I don't clump them together. The only time when I do is if I am solving for when there aren't any real roots. Anyways, so I take the bigger inequalities from the above question for my answer?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I am still wondering how you chose the inequalities.
phi
  • phi
so I take the bigger inequalities ? 1 step at a time: (k-2)(k-10) > 0 this is the condition for 2 real roots You agree that this means (k-2)(k-10) is positive (almost by definition) ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
No, I mean like for K>2 K>10 and K<2 and K<10. How did you choose 2 of them? Can't you also choose k<10 and k>2?
phi
  • phi
Yes, I understand the question, and it will take a few simple sentences to explain. But the first question is (k-2)(k-10) > 0 this is the condition for 2 real roots You agree that this means (k-2)(k-10) is positive (almost by definition) ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah. The discriminant must be positive for 2 real roots.
phi
  • phi
(k-2)(k-10) > 0 this means that both (k-2) is positive and (k-10) is positive or k-2 > 0 and at the same time k-10>0 or k>2 and at the same time k>10 obviously k=3 would make the (k-2) positive, but the (k-10) term would be negative. We need both to be positive. so if you need k>2 and k>10, k>10 works for both terms i.e. k-2 will be positive and k-10 will be positive. Does that answer the question ?
phi
  • phi
Similarly, both terms could be negative, resulting in their product being positive.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I got it, but where did you get the other one from. I got k>10. How about the k<2?
precal
  • precal
|dw:1359309274367:dw| no solution is where your quadratic function does not cross the x axis
phi
  • phi
try doing the analysis with both terms being negative ( - * - = +)
precal
  • precal
|dw:1359309310961:dw|
phi
  • phi
(k-2)(k-10) > 0 this could happen if (k-2) is negative and (k-10) is negative
precal
  • precal
remember the number of times the function crosses the x axis is the number of solutions otherwise you are on the correct path, just reminding you about you are looking for Listen to phi
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, so it can also be k<2 and k<10. k<10 works for both too though.
phi
  • phi
are you sure?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Surely it can't be k<10 and k>10
anonymous
  • anonymous
wait nevermind.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Getting mixed up with negatives... I got it now. So k<2 also works for k<10
phi
  • phi
yes. I draw a number line, and arrows. the place where I get 2 lines overlapping is the answer so for k<2 and k<10 I would draw |dw:1359309685962:dw|
phi
  • phi
or do lots of problems, in which case you memorize the different cases.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I know how to solve these questions easily... it's just that the teacher decided to stump the class... :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks lol. I got it now :D

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.