integral subsitution confused

- anonymous

integral subsitution confused

- schrodinger

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

|dw:1359530329483:dw|

- anonymous

|dw:1359530356277:dw|

- anonymous

|dw:1359530523166:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

what the heck do you do after this

- dumbcow

are those 9's inside radical ?

- anonymous

you dont have to write the whole steps like last time can you just give me advice and yes they are

- anonymous

and you can just make them easy by making them into (3/7x)^2

- anonymous

|dw:1359530730683:dw| (3/7x)^2
something like that for the bottom part

- anonymous

when you do it can you confirm that you get the same solution as in my solving part and help me from there on. thanks

- dumbcow

ok i get same solution (i simplified the constants)
\[\frac{343}{81}(\frac{\sec^{3} \theta}{3} - \sec \theta) +C\]
now you have to substitute back in "x"
\[\tan \theta = \frac{3x}{7}\]
and
\[\sec^{2} \theta = \tan^{2} +1 = \frac{9x^{2}}{49} +1 = \frac{9x^{2} +49}{49}\]
take sqrt to get "sec" , then cube that to get sec^3

- anonymous

so you wouldd ger 3x +7 /7 ?

- anonymous

for sec

- dumbcow

no it would be ... sqrt(9x^2 +49) /7
because of addition inside you can't just take sqrt of each term

- anonymous

oh right right silly me

- anonymous

|dw:1359532127694:dw|

- anonymous

is that it?

- dumbcow

yep ... oh dont forget the 3 in denominator
probably need to s.continue to simplify

- anonymous

but hold on my angles look like this |dw:1359532285169:dw|

- dumbcow

hmm hypotenuse should be .... sqrt(9x^2 +49)

- anonymous

oh f i see why i forgot to square. its 2am and i had a long day -.-

- dumbcow

haha time to get some sleep ....have wolfram do work for you

- anonymous

yep just finished it got the right answer thanks a lot
time for bed i cant even think straight right now

- anonymous

u in us too?

- dumbcow

yeah about 1 am here in AZ (best state)

- anonymous

and dont use wolfram like to get these things down myself

- anonymous

u in college?

- anonymous

taking engineering math not my strongest subject but where the jobs go i go XD

- dumbcow

nope... finished with college , i work as a math tutor so i come on here to practice and help people

- anonymous

hmm so you planning to be a teacher you would be a good one

- dumbcow

engineering is great field but tough classes
have to take quite a bit of math

- anonymous

yep still got to diff linear algebra etc good night
bed is calling for me :P

- dumbcow

i qualified to be a teacher but am undecided .... i prefer tutoring 1 on 1 ..... classroom teaching isn't my style

- dumbcow

bye

- anonymous

you would be a great 1 v1 tutor too yea good night

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.