anonymous
  • anonymous
Group Theory: any one pls guide me with a link to find the definition of these......... 1.(Zm,+) 2.(Zm,*)
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
experimentX
  • experimentX
what is Zm?
Zarkon
  • Zarkon
they prob mean \(Z_m=\{0,1,2,\ldots,m-1\}\)
Zarkon
  • Zarkon
the set of integers mod \(m\)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah!!!! i need complete sentences to explain it... do u have any stuff???
experimentX
  • experimentX
show that it satisfies the property to be called a group.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Exactly!!! can i get that proof or its details... i mean any link???
experimentX
  • experimentX
let 'a' and 'b' be two elements of Zm, show that it is closed in +, ie, \( (a+b) \mod b \in Z_m \)
experimentX
  • experimentX
addition operation is associative, and find the identity element of Zm
experimentX
  • experimentX
Edit:: \[ (a+b) \mod m \in Z_m \]
experimentX
  • experimentX
this is always true becuse \( (a+b) \mod m = c < m, c \in Z\m \)
anonymous
  • anonymous
What i have written below is correct right?? or should there be any change????? Definitions: Let Zm be the set of non negative integers less than m: {0,1, ., m−1} The operation +m is defined as a +m b = (a + b) mod m. This is addition modulo m. The operation ∙m is defined as a ∙m b = (a + b) mod m. This is multiplication modulo m. Using these operations is said to be doing arithmetic modulo m. Example: Find 7 +11 9 and 7 ·11 9. Solution: Using the definitions above: – 7 +11 9 = (7 + 9) mod11 = 16 mod11 = 5 – 7 ·11 9 = (7 ∙ 9) mod11 = 63 mod 11 = 8
experimentX
  • experimentX
huh!! what exactly is the question?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I wanna define it with examples!
experimentX
  • experimentX
aren't those two different distinct groups?
anonymous
  • anonymous
u mean the addition modulo and the other???
experimentX
  • experimentX
yep!! just this one .. (Zm,+), this is a group.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thats it...what is confusing u??
experimentX
  • experimentX
you are mixing two things ... doing both of them at same time.
anonymous
  • anonymous
where did i mix them?? i have defined Zm,then defined addition and multiplication modulo and have given example 4 each...
experimentX
  • experimentX
let's work out one at each ... we do with (Zm,+) first.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ohhh... u mean i have not seperately done it..ryt??? ok got it.... i have jst given it together for my ease....
experimentX
  • experimentX
but why do you want to give example?
anonymous
  • anonymous
definition with example is most expected... so that one can easily understand it....
experimentX
  • experimentX
choose m=10, or 5 for sake of ease. then {0,1,2,3,4} are the elements of group!! show that it remains closed, and is associative and has identity '0', and has inverse.
anonymous
  • anonymous
then is my answer wrong????
experimentX
  • experimentX
no i don't think so ... you put stuff in one place, and it hurt my eyes.
anonymous
  • anonymous
is it ok now??? Let Zm be the set of nonnegative integers less than m: {0,1, ., m−1} 1)The operation +m is defined as a +m b = (a + b) mod m. This is addition modulo m.(Zm,+) Example: Find 7 +11 9 Solution: Using the definitions above: 7 +11 9 = (7 + 9) mod11 = 16 mod11 = 5 2)The operation ∙m is defined as a ∙m b = (a + b) mod m. This is multiplication modulo m. Example: Find 7 ·11 9. Solution: Using the definitions above: 7 ·11 9 = (7 ∙ 9) mod11 = 63 mod 11 = 8
anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX
experimentX
  • experimentX
sorry ... i was busy!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
if possible make some alterations and input the needed stuffs... and edit my answer...pls:)
experimentX
  • experimentX
okay .. you showed that it is closed. you need to test for these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_(mathematics)#Definition
anonymous
  • anonymous
shud i show associativity,identity element and inverse element????
anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX
experimentX
  • experimentX
yes!! you need to show them!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
bt in the link u gave... they have shown for multiplication modulo only.... what can i do for addition modulo???????
experimentX
  • experimentX
same ... show that (a+b) mod m is in the set!!.
experimentX
  • experimentX
instead of multiplying, we add ,,, since operation is +.
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Never seen a Group Theory question before... this should be fun... :D
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Once you've shown closure, next step is to show that there is an element e of Zm (a non-negative integer less than m) such that for any k in Zm e + k = k + e = k
anonymous
  • anonymous
similar to that??? r u sure???
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
+ here is + modulo m, ok
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Quite sure.
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Okay, I'll do this (because it's easier :P) and you do the "existence of inverse" part. Let k be in Zm Consider 0. 0 is a non-negative integer. Since m is positive, 0 < m So 0 is in Zm 0 + k = 0 + k (mod m) = k(mod m) = k, since k is in Zm (and is therefore a nonnegative integer less than m). Similarly, k + 0 = k + 0 (mod m) = k(mod m) = k. Thus, we have shown that 0 + k = k + 0 = k Hence, 0 is the identity element in .
anonymous
  • anonymous
what abt inverse???
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
-.- Here's the gist of it. Consider an arbitrary element of Zm, and show that there is something that you can add (modulo m) to it so that the sum is 0 (the additive identity).
experimentX
  • experimentX
show that for a, m-a is the it's inverse, and m-a is also in the set.
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
@experimentX A spoiler alert, next time? LOL JK
experimentX
  • experimentX
well .. sorry!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
why???
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Never mind, lol... Anyway, let a be in Zm. Your task is to show that an element m-a exists, and m-a is in Zm, and a + (m - a) = 0, where "+" here is + (mod m)
anonymous
  • anonymous
why m-a??? i dnt get it...
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Well, remember that in the world of Zm, every multiple of m is basically zero. So, when I said "what do you need to add to a so that you get zero", I really mean what do you need to add to a to get m...
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
Okay, first of all, the inverse of the additive identity is itself... 0 + 0 = 0, so, yeah... Now, let a be in Zm, where a is not equal to zero. Consider m-a. since a is in Zm, a < m a - a < m - a m - a > 0, meaning m-a is non-negative, (positive, even) m < m + a m - a < m + a - a m - a < m, meaning m-a is less than m. Thus, m-a is non-negative and is less than m, therefore m-a is in Zm. Consider a + (m-a) = a + m - a = m = 0(mod m) Thus, a + (m-a) = 0(mod m) a + (m-a) = 0, in Zm (m-a) is the inverse of a. Thus we have shown that for any element a in Zm, there is an element (m-a) such that a + (m-a) = 0, and therefore, all elements in have inverses :D
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
And there you go, we've shown closure, associativity, existence of an identity element and existence of inverses, we can conclude that forms a group. (An Abelian group, too, but more on some other time, I guess)
anonymous
  • anonymous
great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
terenzreignz
  • terenzreignz
I have to go now, work on the other one: But since we're having spoilers anyway, it's not a group :P The reason for that is for you to find... *cough*oneisthemultiplicativeidentity*cough*theresnothingyoucanmultiplytozerotogetone *cough*zerohasnomultiplicativeinverse *cough* LOL anyway Terence out :D

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.