Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Assume \( f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}\) is such that \(f(x+y)=f(x)f(y)\) ( The class of exponential functions has this property). Prove that f having a limit at 0 implies that f has a limit at every real number and is one, or f is identically 0 for every \( x \in \mathbb{R}\)

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

if \(f\) is identically zero there is nothing to prove
Well you are proving backwards you gotta start from the beginning
i guess we have to worry about \(f\) being continuous start by showing \(f(0)=1\)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

this line Prove that f having a limit at 0 implies that f has a limit at every real number and is one, does not really make sense to me we can show that \(f(0)=1\) but for example if \(f(x)=e^x\) then what does "\(f\) has a limit at every real number and is one" mean?
Not exactly sure hmmmmm
\[f(x)=f(x+0)=f(x)f(0)\implies f(0)=1\]
Aha I see that
if \(f\) is continuous at \(0\) then \[\lim_{h\to 0}f(x+h)=\lim_{h\to 0}f(x)f(h)=f(x)\] making \(f\) continuous
Thanks :) Just gonna string some stuff together here :)
you could write the hypothesis as a limit, then do a change of variable. Since the limit as x goes to 0 exists, we have:\[\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}f(x)=c\]for some c. Let b be a fixed real number, and let x = y-b. Then saying x goes to zero is equivalent to saying y goes to b. So we get this now:\[\lim_{y\rightarrow b}f(y-b)=c\Longrightarrow \lim_{y\rightarrow b}f(y)(f(-b)=c\]\[\Longrightarrow f(-b)\lim_{y\rightarrow b}f(y)=c\]Note that since f(0)=1, it follows that:\[1=f(0)=f(x+(-x))=f(x)f(-x)\]for all x. Therefore\[f(-b)\lim_{y\rightarrow b}f(y)=c\Longrightarrow \lim_{y\rightarrow b}f(y)=cf(b)\]So the limit exists at b. Since b was arbitrary, the limit exists everywhere.
Ohhh I like thisssss :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question