At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

|dw:1359898971161:dw|

@Reaper534 would you kindly help me?

sd|dw:1359901648939:dw|
can you now express

why

:) well done!

now what about b part? Any idea ?

why

i didnt say

but the question ask

asks*

can you tell how you got

ext. angle of triangle

@BAdhi thanks for the spot ..I cant believe I fell for that mistake ! sorry for that @kryton1212

so what is

|dw:1359966959882:dw|

for p, i saw triangle ABP
and for

where is p?

p=

thanks:)

but the question is asking

and why

RP is the angle bisector of

ok, i miss this-.-

BQR seems a bit complicated hmm

is BQR an isos. triangle? we need to prove that BQR is an isos. triangle

since the answer is also h+k..

|dw:1359969862634:dw|
I am not too sure what use we make of the tangent! :|

i know now,

BAC = QBP ? How come ?

PB is a tangent, and

|dw:1359970287522:dw|

P lies out side the circle, your logic is flawed.

but the theorem is this,....

Had P been any point on the circumference, then that'd been equal,

http://www.mathsrevision.net/gcse/pages.php?page=13

The condition is that AB should be a diameter.

Is it given In the ques ? That AB is diameter ?

not at all

Only then the theorem is valid.

Which is not the case here

Alternate Segment Theorem

As I said, those angles would be equal had AB been diameter.

Which is not our case.

are you sure? the alternate segment theorem is not about the diameter.

Wait, leme revise

Ohh I see !
It makes sense, I missed a step.
Yep thats correct.

thanks :)))