anonymous
  • anonymous
When scientists disagree, A. a new method of doing things must be devised. B. each must take sides and develop a new area of science. C. philosophers must be called in to settle the argument. D. scientific experimentation and debate can help settle the differences of opinion.
Biology
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
D
anonymous
  • anonymous
its D, when scientists disagree they will collaborate and work on the problem until a common ground is found, the others are not practical. a philosopher wouldn't be able to solve a problem two nuclear physicists where having, the previous method of doing things wouldn't need to be revise, just the approach, and b just doesn't make any sense.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks:)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.