anonymous
  • anonymous
lim x->-2 2-|x|/(2+x)
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
well i think no matter what -|x| will be +x cuz of the substituion of -2 so it (2+x)/(2+x)=1 and since limit doesn't care when x=-2 only the behaviour it is 1
anonymous
  • anonymous
Great! Thanks for your explanation, I appreciate it. :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
or could be wrong cuzz graphically it looks like -1

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
the answer i got was 1 and its correct, I just don't know the explanation for why its true. Yours looked right, but now Im not sure about it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It was a copy paste error Let me try a second explanation 2-|x|/(2+x) OK so above 2-|x| x will always be negative in numerator cuzz of the absolute value and it being multiplied by a - 2+x we know that the x will get a negative in denominator so we can assume 2+x=2-x cuzz we assume x will and does recieve a - (2-x)/(2-x)=1
anonymous
  • anonymous
great. got it now. thx

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.