At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

Are you sure that's the right equation? That has no roots in the interval [0,1].

well the original function was f(x)=2x(1-x^2+x)ln(x)=x^2-1, not sure if that changes things?

Ah. Then you should get \[2x(1-x^2+x)\ln(x)-x^2\large{\bf +1}.\] That might work better

yeah I made a typo in the original question... still I get stuck calculating x1 being equal to 0

Let me see what I get.

I get x1 = 0.5 - (-0.116434)/(-0.232868), which is 0.5 - 0.5 = 0

Hmm. I am getting the same thing as well. Perhaps try x=.49 or something.

it specifically says use x0=0.5. I just think my professor didn't double check his own work.

No problem.