A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\[\int\limits_{}^{}\arctan(4t)dt\]

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Well, the full solution is quite long. The general solution is that you have to use integration by parts: \[\int\limits_{}^{}udv = uv  \int\limits_{}^{}vdu\] Here, if you let u = arctan 4t, dv = dt you obtain \[du=\frac{ 4 }{16+t^{2}}dt\] and v = t. Then, you substitute back into the equation and solve. The integral of vdu should (if I'm doing my mental calculation correctly) be a usub for u as the denominator.

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0why wouldn't you make just arctan u?

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Because there is no integral formula for arctanu. We know the derivative of arctan u but the integral of arctan u must be done with integration by parts.

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0right but what i mean can we set u=arctan and dv=4t? or does the dt always have to be with one of the items you assign?

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0and wouldn't du above be \[\frac{ 4 }{ 1+16t ^{2} }\]

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Well the thing is that u, v, du, and dv must all be functions. arctan by itself is not a function. What are you evaluating arctan at? You are right though. dv must be attached to dt. The purpose of integration by parts is to obtain all values u, v, du, and dv. if you had let u = dt, then how would you solve for u? If you integrate both sides, what are you integrating u with respect with? If you differentiate u, the derivative of dt has no meaning. And the answer is no to your question, we have u = arctan4t. If you treat the derivative as a fraction, you get \[\frac{ du }{ dt } = \frac{ 1 }{ 16+t ^{2} }\], then you must "multiply" both sides by dt. I must make the obligatory statement that du/dt is NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT a fraction. I will not be able to explain to you why this works without a treatment in differential forms which will confuse more than clarify but trust that it works. You can IMAGINE it as a fraction.

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Perhaps your confusion about integration by parts arises from what it all means. The notation is highly obscure but you need to reexamine what it means. Ultimately, all the equations of u, v, and their derivatives are dependent upon the variable t. However, with the right choices, we can use u, v, du, and dv (remember! they are dependent upon t!!) to rearrange the integral into something much easier to solve. If you look at my original work, you will see I made the choice u = arctan 4t and dv = dt. u here is obviously a function of t. For dv = dt, if you integrate both sides you get v = t, another function of t. Ultimately, evaluating the right hand side of the equation will amount to \[t*\arctan(4t)  \int\limits_{}^{}\frac{ 4t }{ 16+t ^{2} }dt\] Wow. All these expressions are in terms of t. Now you just have to evaluate the integral with another proper method: usubstitution. Integration by parts is merely a way to rearrange integrals. It's the analogous integral version of the product rule of derivatives.

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok i still don't get how you're getting that = ( i know the derivative of arctan is 1/1+x^2 what is is the derivative of arctan(f(x))? isnt is 1/1+(f(x))^2 * f'(x)??

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Your notation is slightly ambiguous: the derivative of arctan(f(x)) with respect to x is: (f'(x))/(1+f(x)^2). Here, f(t) = 4t. f'(t) = 4.

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Oh I see what you're saying. My bad. I type slower than I think. It is 1 + 16t^2.

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no thats how i meant i just put it at the end. usually i use the equation thingy but it takes me forever to post then but i meant for f'(x) to be in the numerator

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1If I'm understanding you correctly, you're absolutely right. I was in a rush to post a reply. The proper evaluation is \[t*\arctan(4t)  \int\limits_{}^{}\frac{ 4t }{ 1 + 16t ^{2} }dt\]

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok now what would i do from there with the next integral? i'm sorry I have so much trouble with these = (

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0would i use the 1/a srctan(x/a) + c?

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0or let u = 4tdt? = (

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Now you do a u substitution. Why? because you noticed that the denominator is a power of 2 while the numerator is a power of 1. If we let u = 1 + 16t^2, we get du = 32 t dt. That means the integral is \[\frac{ 1 }{ 8 }\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{ du }{ u }\] which is obviously the lnu + c. Remember two things, first it's the natural log of the absolute value of u, and second, you are subtracting this integral. After that, you can resubstitute u = 1 + 16t^2 into the natural log and voila, you have the answer.

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1To your first question, no you cannot reduce it to the arctan formula. The arctan formula only works if your numerator is 1. To your second question, are you trying to do another integration by parts? That would be unwise since you can do a usub.

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0you make it sound so easy lol i know how to do almost all of the parts when dealing with integrating and derivatives but i just can't seem to put it all together = (((

bettyboop8904
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok are you up to help me with another one by chance?

khoala4pham
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1No problem @bettyboop8904
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.