A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 one year ago
How do you append results to a list using recursion?
For example, using a basic factorial def:
def fact(n):
if n == 0: return 1
return n * fact(n1)
This will return the "end" result, but what if I wanted to return a list of all the factorials... so that fact(5) would return [1, 1, 2, 6, 24, 120]?
This is a specific question about a general problem of variables or lists getting "reinitialized" every time during a recursive call!
For example: (SPOILER ALERT):
In 2008 PS4, this code will return the value of the *last* year:
def nestEggFixed(salary, save, growthRate, years):
if years == 1: return salary*(save/100.0) #base case, return annual contrib.
return salary*(save/100.0) + (1+growthRate/100.0)*nestEggFixed(salary,save,growthRate,(years1))
# ^ each year adds annual contribution + interest*accumulated total
But the assignment wants a [list] for values after each year. This was easily done iteratively by appending result to a list during each loop, but recursively seems a lot harder...
 one year ago
How do you append results to a list using recursion? For example, using a basic factorial def: def fact(n): if n == 0: return 1 return n * fact(n1) This will return the "end" result, but what if I wanted to return a list of all the factorials... so that fact(5) would return [1, 1, 2, 6, 24, 120]? This is a specific question about a general problem of variables or lists getting "reinitialized" every time during a recursive call! For example: (SPOILER ALERT): In 2008 PS4, this code will return the value of the *last* year: def nestEggFixed(salary, save, growthRate, years): if years == 1: return salary*(save/100.0) #base case, return annual contrib. return salary*(save/100.0) + (1+growthRate/100.0)*nestEggFixed(salary,save,growthRate,(years1)) # ^ each year adds annual contribution + interest*accumulated total But the assignment wants a [list] for values after each year. This was easily done iteratively by appending result to a list during each loop, but recursively seems a lot harder...

This Question is Closed

rsmith6559
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It isn't really. You could pass in the list (empty at first) and as each recursion returns, it appends/prepends to the list. Take a simple recursion like reversing a word, which is a string, which is a list of characters.

breet
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so for the factorial example, what would the code look like? def fact(n): if n == 0 return: [1] return [] + [fact(n1] This seemed reasonable to me, but in fact (excuse the pun!) doesn't work!

breet
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wow... those are some really neat ideas... not immediately intuitive to me, though... which is why recursive methods while elegant in execution, seem more complex to construct (IMHO)

bwCA
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1they were't intuitive to me either, i had to work it out and it took several tries. i usually start by writing out in text what i am trying to accomplish and the steps/actions/resources it will take to accomplish it  then try to make that into code then debug it.

breet
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yeah... me too... only when I think it through that way, the iterative method seems to jump out at me and I have to 'force' myself to try to think of it recursively... But many kudos for your efforts! I had a feeling you might be able to do it with "sub functions"...

bwCA
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1well ... the functions i wrote are recursive procedures but they are iterative processes

bwCA
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1here is one that is a recursive process  it builds up a chain of deferred operations i used the code from your second post :) it's pretty clean  not as messy as the others i posted http://dpaste.com/918529/

breet
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0seems like the code is inching closer to the 'ideal' that I envision (if it even exists?!?)... but I'm not sure the output is correct... fa(5) gives me: [5, 20, 60, 120, 120] whereas I was hoping for [1,1,2,6,24,120]
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.