yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
the distance from the point -i + 2j + 6k to the straight line through the point (2,3,-4) and parallel to the vector 6 i+ 3j - 4k.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Seems like a work for the dot product to me.
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
so i converted all of it into cartesian form. wrote the line as (x-2)/6=(y-3)/3=(z+4)/-4 then i put all of it =r. found out random points. then found out direction ratios of the perpendicular. through condition of perpendicularity found r. and found those random points. and the found the distance. the answer i am getting is wrong.
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1360345934670:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
careful, a line in 3D space shouldn't be written in cartesian form,
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\Large \vec{v} \cdot \vec{SP}= 0 \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\Large 0S \in g \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1360346169283:dw|
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
well it can be written in cartesian form with direction ratios.
anonymous
  • anonymous
well if you want to do it like that, then unfortunately I can't help you. I haven't seen such a thing, what I would agree with, is saying that you can always set up an equation of a plane that includes the line and from there figure out the distance. But as soon as I see something of the form x+y+z=c, I think of a plane, not of a line.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
I am confused for many reasons: "the distance from the point -i + 2j + 6k..." but -i +2j + 6k is not a point. and the distance to which point on the other line? the minimum distance I presume?
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
hmm. i just want to confirm if i am interpreting the question right. its saying the line is parallel to the vector 6 i+ 3j - 4k and not that it wants the distance parallel to this vector?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Mathematical definition is always considering it's normal, orthogonal point. That is a distance. So if you have a point given, as I tried to sketch it in the above picture, then it's distance to the line is the one where you start from the line, draw a right angle through that point and figure out the distance.
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
@TuringTest well its the position vector as they call it. its basically a point.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
ok, I think I understand the question better now, thanks
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
@Spacelimbus well i still have the doubt. does it ask for the distance parallel to that vector? or the line is parallel to that vector? 6 i+ 3j - 4k.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
the line is parallel to the vector in my interpretation
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
|dw:1360346673680:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
To set up an equation in the 3D-Space, you need a direction vector, an a point, that's how I interpret it, because that satisfies the equation: \[\Large r_x=0P + \lambda \vec{v} \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I guess @sirm3d and I agree then, 6i+4j-4k is a direction vector of the parametric line
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
as @Spacelimbus said, it's the dot product at work here.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
I agree as well, for what that's worth :p
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
hmm. and whats wrong with the method i'm using?
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1360346938724:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
stealing @sirm3d superior model
sirm3d
  • sirm3d
|dw:1360347140886:dw| \[\cos \theta = \frac{\vec{PR} \cdot \vec{SR}}{|\vec{PR}||\vec{SR}|}\\|\vec{PS}|=|\vec{PR}|\sin\theta\]
yrelhan4
  • yrelhan4
i think i can do it now. thank you guys.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.