A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
yrelhan4
 2 years ago
the distance from the point i + 2j + 6k to the straight line through the point (2,3,4) and parallel to the vector 6 i+ 3j  4k.
yrelhan4
 2 years ago
the distance from the point i + 2j + 6k to the straight line through the point (2,3,4) and parallel to the vector 6 i+ 3j  4k.

This Question is Closed

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Seems like a work for the dot product to me.

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so i converted all of it into cartesian form. wrote the line as (x2)/6=(y3)/3=(z+4)/4 then i put all of it =r. found out random points. then found out direction ratios of the perpendicular. through condition of perpendicularity found r. and found those random points. and the found the distance. the answer i am getting is wrong.

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2dw:1360345934670:dw

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2careful, a line in 3D space shouldn't be written in cartesian form,

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2\[\Large \vec{v} \cdot \vec{SP}= 0 \]

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2\[\Large 0S \in g \]

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2dw:1360346169283:dw

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0well it can be written in cartesian form with direction ratios.

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2well if you want to do it like that, then unfortunately I can't help you. I haven't seen such a thing, what I would agree with, is saying that you can always set up an equation of a plane that includes the line and from there figure out the distance. But as soon as I see something of the form x+y+z=c, I think of a plane, not of a line.

TuringTest
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I am confused for many reasons: "the distance from the point i + 2j + 6k..." but i +2j + 6k is not a point. and the distance to which point on the other line? the minimum distance I presume?

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm. i just want to confirm if i am interpreting the question right. its saying the line is parallel to the vector 6 i+ 3j  4k and not that it wants the distance parallel to this vector?

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Mathematical definition is always considering it's normal, orthogonal point. That is a distance. So if you have a point given, as I tried to sketch it in the above picture, then it's distance to the line is the one where you start from the line, draw a right angle through that point and figure out the distance.

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@TuringTest well its the position vector as they call it. its basically a point.

TuringTest
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok, I think I understand the question better now, thanks

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Spacelimbus well i still have the doubt. does it ask for the distance parallel to that vector? or the line is parallel to that vector? 6 i+ 3j  4k.

TuringTest
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the line is parallel to the vector in my interpretation

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2To set up an equation in the 3DSpace, you need a direction vector, an a point, that's how I interpret it, because that satisfies the equation: \[\Large r_x=0P + \lambda \vec{v} \]

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2I guess @sirm3d and I agree then, 6i+4j4k is a direction vector of the parametric line

sirm3d
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1as @Spacelimbus said, it's the dot product at work here.

TuringTest
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I agree as well, for what that's worth :p

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm. and whats wrong with the method i'm using?

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2dw:1360346938724:dw

Spacelimbus
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2stealing @sirm3d superior model

sirm3d
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1dw:1360347140886:dw \[\cos \theta = \frac{\vec{PR} \cdot \vec{SR}}{\vec{PR}\vec{SR}}\\\vec{PS}=\vec{PR}\sin\theta\]

yrelhan4
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i think i can do it now. thank you guys.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.