I'm adding my vectors incorrectly. Please give me a min to draw it.

- anonymous

I'm adding my vectors incorrectly. Please give me a min to draw it.

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

|dw:1360530853167:dw|

- anonymous

\[\vec{F}_{net}=(\vec F_{41}-\vec F_{31}\cos(45))\hat i +(\vec F_{21}-\vec F_{31}\sin(45)) \hat j\]

- anonymous

|dw:1360531227825:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

\[F_{net}=\left( \frac{kq_4q_1}{r_{41}^2}-\frac{kq_3q_1}{r_{31}^2}\sin(45)\right) \hat i \left(\frac{kq_2q_1}{r_{21}^2}-\frac{kq_3q_1}{r_{31}^2}\cos(45)\right) \hat j\]

- anonymous

\[q_1=3\times10^{-9}\]
\[q_2=9\times10^{-9}\]
\[q_3=-9\times10^{-9}\]
\[q_4=9\times10^{-9}\]

- anonymous

|dw:1360531777377:dw|

- anonymous

@phi

- anonymous

I get \[(72974.5 N)\hat i\]

- anonymous

which is wrong...

- anonymous

.000392 should be the answer

- anonymous

|dw:1360532089439:dw|

- phi

8 orders of magnitude is quite an error

- anonymous

it sure is ...haha

- anonymous

the charges were given in nano coulombs. I converted them to coulombs.
\[q_1=+3nC=3\times 10^{-9}\]

- anonymous

k=8.99E9

- phi

First, what units is the answer given in ?

- anonymous

Newtons \hat{i}

- anonymous

maybe I read the question wrong

##### 1 Attachment

- phi

your approach is ok.
I would write down the components of each vector

- phi

the k 9e9 times 9e-9 gives 81. that still leaves a 3e-9
are you double counting the k ?

- anonymous

|dw:1360532909843:dw|
oh my gosh ...yes I think soooo

- anonymous

I'll do it on wolfram... one sec

- anonymous

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28%28%288.99e9%29%289e%28-9%29%29%283e%28-9%29%29%29%2F%28.02^2%29%29-%28%288.99e9%29%28-9e%28-9%29%29%283e%28-9%29%29%29%2F%28.028^2%29%29cos%2845%29%29

- anonymous

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28coulombs+constant+*3nC*4nC%29%2F%282cm^2%29++-+++%28coulombs+constant+*-9nC*3nC%29%2F%282.8cm^2%29

- anonymous

I found another error...this looks better
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28coulombs+constant+*9nC*3nC%29%2F%282cm^2%29++-+++%28coulombs+constant+*-9nC*3nC%29%2F%282.8cm^2%29

- anonymous

and another error....
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28coulombs+constant+*9nC*3nC%29%2F%28%282cm%29^2%29++-+++%28coulombs+constant+*-9nC*3nC%29%2F%28%282.8cm%29^2%29

- anonymous

silly question...
\[F_{31}=F_{31x}+F_{31y}\]
is this true?

- anonymous

or is it
\[F_{31}=\sqrt{F_{31x}^2+F_{31y}^2}\]

- phi

ignoring the units (we can figure those out later)
the force from the top left corner is <9*3/4 i 0 j>
the force from the bottom right is < 0 i 9*3/4 j>
the force from the bottom left is < -9*3/8 * 1/sqrt(2) i - 9*3/8 *1/sqrt(2) j>
add up the components to get
27/4( 1- 1/2sqrt(2)) for both i and j components
that number is 4.3635
now to get the units 1e-18 C^2 * 9e-9 N-M^2 /C^2 * 1e4 M^2 (to fix the cm)
that factor is 9e-5
and our result is 4.3635*9e-5 = 0.0003927 N for both the i and j components

- phi

as for your "silly" question. if by F31x you mean < F31x 0> and by F31y < 0 F31y>
then yes, F31= F31x+F31y
the magnitude of F31 is as you wrote it.

- anonymous

why is
"the force from the bottom left is < -9*3/8 * 1/sqrt(2) i"
Why did you divide by 8

- phi

the distance (diagonal) is 2 sqrt(2). squared you get 4*2= 8
the 1/sqrt(2) is cos(45) (often written as sqrt(2)/2 but we don't need to write it that way)

- phi

your 2.8 was just an approximation

- phi

I think the resultant force vector is
< 0.0003927 i 0.0003927 j>
with a magnitude of 0.000555 N pointing in the opposite direction of the diagonal

- anonymous

Yep that's correct...I'm still trying to make sense of it...one second...

- anonymous

\[(9\cdot 3 \cdot\frac 14+(-9)3\cdot \frac 18 \cdot \frac 1{\sqrt2})\hat i\] and for \hat j as well
Yep that makes sense

- anonymous

what happened to k

- phi

I was ignoring the constants and units, just to get a rough idea of what is going on. I see that both the i and j components are positive and equal to each other.
but obviously you have to multiply every term by k, and by 1e-9 (twice! to change nC to C)
and by 1e4 cm^2 per meter^2 to get the units correct.

- anonymous

Oh I see

- phi

if we use 8.99e9 for k, we match the book's answer 0.000392

- anonymous

shoot me....I continue to get .0000082137
\[\frac{(8.99\times10^9N\cdot m^2/C^2)(9\times10^{-9}C)(3\times10^{-9}C)}{0.04m^2}\]\[-\frac{(8.99\times10^9N\cdot m^2/C^2)(-9\times10^{-9}C)(3\times10^{-9}C)(\frac 1{\sqrt{2}})}{0.08m^2}\]

- anonymous

\[\frac{(8.99\times10^9N\cdot m^2/C^2)(9\times10^{-9}C)(3\times10^{-9}C)}{0.04m^2}\]-\[-\frac{(8.99\times10^9N\cdot m^2/C^2)(-9\times10^{-9}C)(3\times10^{-9}C)(\frac 1{\sqrt{2}})}{\sqrt0.08m^2}\]

- phi

First, I would not write down that expression. I would write down the 3 individual vectors (with components i and j even if 0)
Second, your distance squared should be written \( (2e{-2}\ m)^2\)= \( 4e{-4}\ m^2\)

- phi

and \( 2 \sqrt{2} \) cm squared is written as 8e-4 m^2

- anonymous

finally!!!1

- phi

Good.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.