Not that this is any sort of great question, but I was wondering why we don't just have a "Science" suuject (unless, of course we do and i don't know it :D). You can eliminate subjects like "Biology" and "Chemistry" and make them sub-categories for one big subject like Mathematics. It may just be a stupid idea but, I decided to just put it out there. But, i should like to know, is there just s science subject?
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
The question is balance between generality and specificity.
I, for example, think that "biology" is a large umbrella subject to which subsections such as molecular biology, classical genetics, computational biology, biochemistry, ecology, earth science (not technically a biologic science at all, but people seem fond of posting earth science questions there for some reason) and so on.
Chemistry could have organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, analytic chemistry, etc.
Physics could have quantum mechanics, particle physics, electricity, mechanics, statics, and so on.
And that by grouping all these incredibly huge, broad subjects as subsections of simply "science" would be a vast over simplification.