anonymous
  • anonymous
Find the directional derivative of \[f(x,y,z) = yz + x^4\] at (2,3,1) in the direction of vector v=i+j+k. I have gotten as far as finding the directional derivative (gradient) at (2,3,1) which is: 32i+3j+k I dont know how to do the second part of this problem. What does it mean to find this direction? What do I have to do to the gradient to find it? My book is very vague, please help!
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Tips?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The box for the answer says fu= _____ , where u looks like a unit vector, is that what this is asking for? A unit vector of the gradient?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Never mind, that, I tried, and was told my answer should be a number, not a vector. Guess I misinterpreted that.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[ \newcommand \ve [1] { \mathbf{#1} }% vector \nabla_{\ve v}f(\ve x)=\nabla f(\ve x)\cdot{\ve v}\\ \ \\ f=yz+x^4\\ \ve v=(1,1,1)\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think I understand what you wrote, but it still isnt clear to me what "in the direction of" means... I can find the gradient just fine, I've just no idea what to do with it.
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
once you have found the gradient, take the dot product with the direction vector
anonymous
  • anonymous
ahhhhh, that makes sense, thank you!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.