anonymous
  • anonymous
This is a MML exercise of of Sullivan's Essential Statistics. I don't know why this is true. See attached high lighted question.
Mathematics
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
See attached
phi
  • phi
If we can exclude (or correct for) loss of height at older ages due to loss of skeletal mass, then we could say that men born 80 years ago were (on average) shorter than men born 60 years ago, who were shorter than men born 40 years ago, ... In other words, men were shorter years ago, and are taller now...

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.