At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I have absolutely know idea how to solve this problem using it, 3x - 2y + 2z - w = 2 4x + y + z + 6w = 8 -3x + 2y - 2z + w = 5 5x + 3z - 2w = 1 Wants me to find the solution
I mean no instead of know. *face palm*
The matrix version or the simple "moving variables around" version?
I believe its the 'simple' moving variables around version
I just threw this into Wolfram|Alpha, and it didn't give me any value results. Do you need value results?
Nope, it says find the solution or state that none exists./ So I guess there isnt a solution
Oh, then I'll show you why there isn't one then. When doing the simple version of Gaussian elimination, always look for "bare" variables first (variables that has a coefficient of 1, otherwise known as "that variable with no numbers"). In this case: 3x - 2y + 2z - w = 2 (1) 4x + y + z + 6w = 8 (2) -3x + 2y - 2z + w = 5 (3) 5x + 3z - 2w = 1 (4) In this case, we notice that in Equation 1 and 3, both w are bare (although there's a minus sign before the w in Eq. 1). Shift w around in Eq. 1 to make it positive again. Now change the subject: 3x - 2y + 2z - w = 2 becomes w = 3x - 2y + 2z - 2 and -3x + 2y - 2z + w = 5 becomes w = 5 + 3x - 2y + 2z. Now that w is (sort of) found, hook them together: 3x - 2y + 2z - 2 = 5 + 3x - 2y + 2z. You see that after simplifying you're left with -2 = 5, which is obviously impossible. Therefore, there is no solution since two of the so-called "related equations" contradict each other.
Got it, thank you.!