Quantcast

A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

manjuthottam

  • 2 years ago

Theoreticals of Calculus: could someone explain indexed family of sets to me??

  • This Question is Closed
  1. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Here is a pdf of a question and solution involving indexed family sets on page 5 & 6! please and thankyou!!

    1 Attachment
  2. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    is there a difference between {} and [] ? Also I am making more mistake on finding the intersection portion of the set

  3. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, whenever you see { and }, those denote generic sets. In this case, [ and ] are denoting an interval on the real number line. So [1,2] is just every real number \(x\) such that \(1\le x\le2\). So if you have \[\left\{\left[1,1+\frac{1}{n}\right]:n\in\mathbb{N}\right\},\] this is the set of all intervals \([1,1+1/n]\) such that \(n\) is a natural number greater than 0.

  4. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    And can you be a little more specific on what parts about the intersection are confusing you?

  5. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh ok i understand now about the {} and[]! about the intersection, on page 5 the intersection is {1} but why on page 7 the intersection is empty set?

  6. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i thought the answer would be 1 as well

  7. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ah. On page 7, they use ( and ) instead of [ and ]. The difference between these two, is whether the endpoints are included. So if you have [1,2], this is every real number x such that \(1\le x\le2\). However, (1,2) is every real number x such that \(1<x<2\).

  8. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You can also mix and match. So (1,2] would be all real numbers x such that \(1<x\le2\). All in all, on page 7, you have an empty intersection because 1 is never included in any of the sets.

  9. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh so since < > are used, 1 is not part of the set, just the smallest number slightly greater than it is?

  10. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Precisely.

  11. manjuthottam
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    that makes sense thank you!!

  12. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're welcome.

  13. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.