Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

|dw:1361317472233:dw|
|dw:1361317624407:dw|
\[W=-\triangle U=-\int F\cdot dl=-\int_{x_1}^{x_2} Fdx=-kq_1q_2\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\frac{dr}{r^2}=-\frac{-kq_1q_2}{r}\] I figured that \[q=\sigma A\] I'm told that the charge densities are equal and opposite on the two large plates.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Oh and we're moving an electron from the negatively charged plate to the positively charged plate.
I calculated the electric field already
what is the question?
I have to calculate the work done to move an electron from the negative plate to the positive plate.
|dw:1361318208383:dw| This is the force I need to overcome correct?
|dw:1361318290447:dw|
My class is about to start...
there is no resistance force to overcome, just the inertia of the electron moving due to the E field
but the electric field is pointing in the opposite direction of where the electron is moving to
but the E-field points in the direction that a *positive* test charge would move. After all, an electron wants to go from negative to positive, right? Like repels like and so forth...
Oh I see...
In that case: \[W=-\triangle U=-q\triangle\] q= is the charge of an electron correct?
oops! \[W=-\triangle U=-q\triangle V\]
I would say the elementary charge is \(q=-e\)\[W=-\int(-e)\vec E\cdot d\vec\ell=-e\int Edx\]Note that three negatives multiply to give a negative result. One negative from the charge, one from the fact that a positive charge moving along the E field lines goes down in energy, and one from the fact that E and the direction of motion are antiparallel.
so shouldn't use the relationship I wrote earlier
I'm given the potential difference between the plates
I mean shouldn't *I use the relationship I wrote earlier
sorry typo
I mean if I'm given delta V and I know e ....I should be able to just multiply those to get delta U
right, then that's all
oh and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule are \[C\cdot V=Joules \] correct?
coulombs*volts=jouls, yeah
Thanks Max!
Welcome "Jennifer/sophya"
LOL!!!!!! Not even close haha
since KE=U the kinetic energy would be the same correct?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question