anonymous
  • anonymous
let W(s,t) =F(u(s,t))where F,u,v are differentiable and u(1,0) =2; v(1.0)=3;us(1,0)=-2;vs(1,0)=5;ut(1,0)=6;vt(1,0)=4;Fu(2,3)=-1;Fv(2,3)=10. Find Ws(1,0) and Wt(1,0)
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
it's quite easy to just put everything into the formula to get the answer is 34. my question is why dF/du at (1,0) can be calculate by Fu(2,3).the same problem with dF/dv
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
where is v in your formula?
anonymous
  • anonymous
F(u(s,t),v(s,t)). where... yes. it is

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

TuringTest
  • TuringTest
W(1,0)=F(u(1,0),v(1,0))and we are told that u(1,0)=2 and v=(1,0)=3, so W(1,0)=F(2,3)
experimentX
  • experimentX
looks like multivariable chain rule problem ...
anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX yes, it is. @TuringTest and then?
experimentX
  • experimentX
Fu(2,3) <--- this 2 and 3 are the values of u and v when (s,t) = (1,0) .. this is just change of variables.
anonymous
  • anonymous
you mean\[Ws = \frac{ \delta F }{ \delta u }\frac{ \delta u }{ \delta s }+\frac{ \delta F }{ \delta v }\frac{ \delta v }{ \delta s }\] and
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\frac{ \delta F }{ \delta u }= F(2,3)\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
is it right?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
the second formula you wrote is not right, the first is
experimentX
  • experimentX
\[ F_u(u(1,0), v(1,0))\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
@TuringTest mine is wrong? why? @experimentX I think i got it. need time to make it clear in my mind. i will let you know when i get it perfectly. thanks anyway
experimentX
  • experimentX
you can't simply equate the partial differential with the function itself.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes, i don't understand the goal of this part. we take partial derivative for what? tangent line respect to coordinates?
experimentX
  • experimentX
\[ \frac{ \partial F }{ \partial u }= F_u(2,3)\] is the correct expression ... this does't have any goal. this is simply like You know a function W of 's' and 't' ... but you do not know it as an explicit function of s and t.
experimentX
  • experimentX
instead you know it a function of 'u' and 'v' ... which in in turn function of 's' and 't' ... how do you find the tangent at given values of 's' and 't'?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Hey. think about t is time, s is the length, and v is velocity which function respect to s,t. and we need those part to get the function of v and some u(as a variable which respect to s, t , too. I don't think we study for nothing . if putting everything in big scenario, i think we get more effect than just formula, formula...and formula
experimentX
  • experimentX
suppose ... we have function like this, \[ \huge W(s,t) = \int_0^s \cosh (tx) dx + \sin(s)\cos(t) \] how do you calculate those partial values
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, you are right, antiderivative for those parts? we must know the technique to solve that problem, but it must be used in somewhere, right? to me, the goal of partial derivative is find out the slope of tangent line in R3 respect to x,y,z.
experimentX
  • experimentX
yeah ... it is much easier to solve it (for partial) ... we can solve for it without knowing how to evaluate that integral.
anonymous
  • anonymous
to x axis, the tangent line has the slope totally different from it is to y axis and z axis as well. and those tangent line has the different equation, too. and then, to each dimension in R3, each of them respect to time, to velocity of something or at least to a stable origin as earth
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, sorry, I think tooooo far. waste your time
experimentX
  • experimentX
its okay ... the partial with respect to time will give you velocity along x and y axis
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah. when i were at kindergarden school, study addition and subtraction to count money or count my fingers. a little bit older, study multiplication and division to know how to count money and account. now, study partial derivative for ,,,,,don't know is really boring.
experimentX
  • experimentX
i've been doing this for last 20 years
anonymous
  • anonymous
and never ask yourself the silly question like me?
experimentX
  • experimentX
of course i've in the past .. i think you are just little confused with the notation. while doing these sorta question .. it does smoothly unless it's hard type.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks for answering my question. I have many, many many homework from my classes. i wish i have 28 hours a day to solve all of them and to completely understand all of them, Thanks a lot. I have to go to school now. Hopefully I can get your help whenever I stuck at somewhere
experimentX
  • experimentX
sure ... anytime!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Bye bye.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.