At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
the 2013 one is happening now so the lectures haven't been given nor recorded yet, so i don't know why someone would recommend them. for the other ones, it probably comes down to which instructor you like best. i've watched the first couple videos from both and they seem to be repeating the exact same material. i'm going with 2011, my thought being that they might've tweaked it for the better.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
because i took the 2012 one and its was great ...so i can imagine only improvements on the 2013 one..plus you have the possibility for a certificate...and feedback on your progress....so i dont know why not to recommend it...
The Spring 2011 course is part of the "OCW Scholar" series, so it is a complete stand-alone course that doesn't need additional materials. The 2008 class isn't, so that was a factor in my decision to go with 2011.
2008 unless you want to do the EDX version
Thanks for your answers guys. Right now I am working on other stuff too, so I don't think I can catch up with the 2013 program. I guess I will continue with the 2011 one.