- ParthKohli

Suppose that:
1 + 1 = 7
2 + 2 = 89
3 + 3 = 228
4 + 4 = ?

- schrodinger

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- ParthKohli

Let's see how good you are at arithmetic. >:-)

- ParthKohli

What kind of module?

- shubhamsrg

404 ?
(going by a forced logic !) -_-

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- Opcode

520 is Opcode guess?

- ParthKohli

- anonymous

8!!!!

- ParthKohli

That's right! ^

- ParthKohli

Does no one know 4 + 4 = 8?!

- anonymous

for realz

- anonymous

What about 1 + 1, 2 + 2, and 3+3?
Or is it just a trick?

- ParthKohli

@RD⁴² ?

- ParthKohli

What about them?

- anonymous

1 + 1 = 7
2 + 2 = 89
3 + 3 = 228
Why?

- anonymous

I don't get the joke, honestly.

- ParthKohli

I have asked you to just assume that. I didn't ask you to get to a conclusion that 1 + 1 is related to 4 + 4.

- anonymous

It makes no sense, but ok.

- anonymous

>: )

- shubhamsrg

Here was my forced logic :
7= (4)(5)/2 -3
89 = (13)(14)/2 -2
228 = (21)(22)/2 -3
So for odd terms like 1+1, or 3+3 , we subtract 3 from n(n+1)/2
for even terms, we subtract 2
now for n, it is 4,13,21 --> So from the differences, I say the next term is 28
hence 4+4 = (28)(29)/2 -2 =404
:3

- ParthKohli

Sir, you have my respect.

- Opcode

Too lazy to show my work :-).
But I gave him a medal because he did ^_^.

- shubhamsrg

LAWL !!

- anonymous

I know this is late, but I object. It's 424.
Let \(\large x + x = \dfrac{1}{2}(57x^2 - 7x - 36)\)
When x = 1, 1 + 1 = 7
When x = 2, 2 + 2 = 89
When x = 3, 3 + 3 = 228
Lastly, when x = 4, 4 + 4 = \(\boxed{424}\)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=table[%2857+x^2+-+7x+-+36%29%2F2%2C+{x%2C1%2C4}]
Looks like it is safe to say that this question is ambiguous.
Sir, you are not supposed to post an ambiguous question, @ParthKohli

- ParthKohli

how is this ambiguous? do you not know 4 + 4 = 8?

- anonymous

Yet, you said 1 + 1 = 7

- ParthKohli

I asked you to suppose 1 + 1 = 7.
I didn't ask you to assume that 4 + 4 will be based on 1 +1, 2 + 2 and 3 + 3.

- anonymous

It does since 2 + 2 = \(\large 8\)9 and 3 + 3 = 22\(\large 8\)
Beside shubhamsrg has other answers. There are several reasonable answers for this, hence ambiguous.

- anonymous

Also, 'suppose' means 'assume,' according to dictionary.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/suppose

- anonymous

@micahwood50 Thank you!
@ParthKohli He has good points...

- Opcode

It's a trick question :3
We fell for it :P

- anonymous

Oh and don't you know that 1+1 ACTUALLY equal 2?

- anonymous

If 1+1 =7, then it affects numeric system, which can also affect the value of 4.

- anonymous

And we know that 2+2 =89 so if 4+4 = 8 then 2 is bigger than 4.

- anonymous

You have not given whether numeric system affects 4 or not, hence ambiguous.

- anonymous

- ParthKohli

If I haven't given so, you shouldn't assume that 4 + 4 is based on the prior sequence.

- anonymous

so you admit this question is ambiguous

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.