Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

dfresenius

xy' + y = −2xy^2 Bernoulli Differential equation.

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, this is a bit strange because they want me to substitute u=y^(1-n)

    • one year ago
  2. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so, im thinking to start off, i will get x and y on one side.

    • one year ago
  3. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362709077091:dw|

    • one year ago
  4. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i suppose i should state what bernoulli is

    • one year ago
  5. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\large xy' + y = −2xy^2\]Hmm it's been a lil while.. I'm trying to remember how to do these. I think you want to get the equation to this form. ~Divide both sides by x, Divide both sides by y^2. \[\large y^{-2}y' + \frac{1}{x}y^{-1} = −2\] Then let \(\large u=y^{-1}\). Hmm \(\large u'=-y^{-2}\)

    • one year ago
  6. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Woops, \(\large u'=-y^{-2}y'\)

    • one year ago
  7. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362709205198:dw|

    • one year ago
  8. abb0t
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Haven't seen bernoulli in some time.

    • one year ago
  9. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ya im a bit shaky on this but im caught up to you zep, so the u'=y'y^-2 , can you explain that?

    • one year ago
  10. abb0t
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    u' = y^-2y' is what your going to substitute. essentially, you're going to get a linear differential euqation.

    • one year ago
  11. abb0t
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    You should get something like: u' + p(x)u=g(x)

    • one year ago
  12. abb0t
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    after you substitute everything.

    • one year ago
  13. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\large y'+p(x)y=q(x)y^n\] Dividing both sides by y^n, \(\large \color{royalblue}{y^{-n}y'}+p(x)\color{orangered}{y^{1-n}}=q(x)\) Making the sub \(\large \color{orangered}{u=y^{1-n}}\) \(\large u'=(1-n)y^{-n}y' \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \color{royalblue}{\dfrac{1}{1-n}u'=y^{-n}y'}\) Giving us, yah something like what abbot said :)

    • one year ago
  14. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I tried to use colors to make that clearer, but it's still rather confusing lol

    • one year ago
  15. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ya, im just puzzled

    • one year ago
  16. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so, with my equation,

    • one year ago
  17. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\large xy' + y = −2xy^2\]Dividing each side by x gives us,\[\large y' + \frac{1}{x}y = −2y^2\]Dividing each side by y^2 (Because that is our y^n is this case) gives,\[\large y^{-2}y' + \frac{1}{x}\color{royalblue}{y^{1-2}} = −2\]Then we want to make that blue term our \(\large u\).

    • one year ago
  18. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362709954712:dw|

    • one year ago
  19. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Our \(\large n\) in this case is 2, because our y^n was the term on the RIGHT side of the equation. \(\large u=y^{1-n} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad u=y^{2-1}\qquad \rightarrow \qquad u=y^{-1}\)

    • one year ago
  20. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok that makes sense

    • one year ago
  21. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362710284245:dw|

    • one year ago
  22. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I think maybe you missed a negative when taking the derivative of your u. \(\huge u=y^{-1} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad u'=\color{red}{-}y^{-2}y'\)

    • one year ago
  23. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh the derivative gotcha

    • one year ago
  24. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I assume we're taking the derivative with respect to \(\large x\). That's probably why we get a prime term on each side :d

    • one year ago
  25. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362710497399:dw|

    • one year ago
  26. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yes good! :)

    • one year ago
  27. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Remember that before you can get an integrating factor and all that fun stuff, your leading term needs to be positive.

    • one year ago
  28. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok

    • one year ago
  29. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    should i just switch sides?

    • one year ago
  30. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Or maybe a better way to say that would be, it needs to be in standard form* no coefficients or anything on the leading term.

    • one year ago
  31. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Just multiply everything by -1 :)

    • one year ago
  32. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362710598175:dw|

    • one year ago
  33. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Woops, standard form looks like this,\[\large u'+P(x)u=Q(x)\]

    • one year ago
  34. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    You had it in your middle step.

    • one year ago
  35. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362710722310:dw|

    • one year ago
  36. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    heh XD

    • one year ago
  37. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok so, i integrate both sides?

    • one year ago
  38. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    No you need to find an integrating factor \(\large \mu=e^{\int P(x)\;dx}\) Look familiar I hope? :)

    • one year ago
  39. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ya let me check real quick

    • one year ago
  40. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362710969094:dw|

    • one year ago
  41. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Woops the negative sign is also part of your \(\large P(x)\). Recall that the standard form shows addition in the middle there.

    • one year ago
  42. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    dangit, i need to stop rushing

    • one year ago
  43. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    And your equation should be \(\large u'-\dfrac{1}{x}u=2\) Positive 2 on the right. I think we missed that earlier.

    • one year ago
  44. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yes you do need to stop rushing Chris Farley!! Slow down in life! Or you'll end up leaving us too soon......... :'C

    • one year ago
  45. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    haha nice

    • one year ago
  46. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362711281571:dw|

    • one year ago
  47. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\huge e^{-\ln x} \qquad = \qquad e^{\ln (x^{-1})} \qquad = \qquad ?\]

    • one year ago
  48. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1/x

    • one year ago
  49. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Cool c:

    • one year ago
  50. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    my bad

    • one year ago
  51. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok so now that i have that, i multiply by x^-1

    • one year ago
  52. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yes, if you want to be thorough, then multiply through by your integrating factor. I usually skip that step. But it might be good not to skip it since you're learning it still.

    • one year ago
  53. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok,

    • one year ago
  54. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362711568703:dw|

    • one year ago
  55. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    now, i want to isolate u' right?

    • one year ago
  56. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Looks good so far c: BTW, just a little note: You can scale the size of the drawing box if you don't want to take up that much space.|dw:1362711683197:dw|

    • one year ago
  57. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    From here, you want to recognize that the LEFT side is the result of the product rule.

    • one year ago
  58. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\large \left[u(x)f(x)\right]' \qquad = \qquad u'(x)f(x)+u(x)f'(x)\] We do that have in this case don't we? Where our f(x)=x^{-1}

    • one year ago
  59. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes, so I can simplify the left

    • one year ago
  60. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    ya sounds good c:

    • one year ago
  61. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362711903145:dw|

    • one year ago
  62. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Oh sorry I forget you were calling it \(\large I\). I hope I didn't make that more confusing c:

    • one year ago
  63. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    yah everything looks good so far.

    • one year ago
  64. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362712182784:dw|

    • one year ago
  65. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Cx

    • one year ago
  66. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yes good. Then we have to do a little work changing our \(\large u\) back to \(\large y\)

    • one year ago
  67. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok, u=y^-1

    • one year ago
  68. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Good.\[\large \frac{1}{y}=2x \ln x+Cx\]So how do we solve for y?

    • one year ago
  69. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362712446678:dw|

    • one year ago
  70. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yay good job! I threw it into Wolfram just a moment ago to make sure we didn't make any fatal errors. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=xy%27%2By%3D-2xy%5E2 Same result! Yay! :)

    • one year ago
  71. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    YESSS

    • one year ago
  72. dfresenius
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thank you so much for your patience, i have been doing very well in my class because of your help

    • one year ago
  73. zepdrix
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Oh that's good to hear! c: I'm sure it's not just me. You seem to understand these concepts very very quickly.

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.