Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

walters Group Title

Let G be the group of all invertible 2 x 2 matrics over the C of complex numbers with matrix multiplication a)Find the subgroup of G generated by

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    This matrix. I got you the first time :) \[\huge \left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  2. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    A=|dw:1362839192398:dw|

    • one year ago
  3. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I have a better handwriting!!! Just kidding. So, we're taking a cyclic group, generated by that matrix above, using matrix multiplication. Evaluate this...\[\huge \left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  4. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    If matrices make you dizzy, (they make me dizzy) use this formula... \[\huge \left[\begin{matrix}a & b \\ c & d\end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}p & q \\ r & s\end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix}ap+br & aq+bs \\ cp+dr & cq+ds\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  5. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    looks like we could take out i's

    • one year ago
  6. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1362839499204:dw|

    • one year ago
  7. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    And of course, I was doing it inefficiently :D Bloody matrices... Thanks @experimentX @walters As you 'heard', we have this convenient setup... \[\huge \left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]=i\left[\begin{matrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  8. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    before going too far wat if i use A and other matrix that in invertible

    • one year ago
  9. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Now THAT's going too far :) We're only asked to figure out what the elements of the cyclic group generate by \[\huge\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  10. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    are we not suppose to use those axioms of subgroups

    • one year ago
  11. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    You can do that, but why bother? Let G be a group. For any element g in G, <g> (the set generated by repeatedly operating g on itself) is always a subgroup of G. In other words, the cyclic group generated by an element of a group is a subgroup :)

    • one year ago
  12. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Shall we proceed? :)

    • one year ago
  13. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes, it seems i have no idea "how to do it"

    • one year ago
  14. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Okay, you can verify this, but \[\huge \left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  15. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    You know what? For convenience, we can let \[\huge A=\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  16. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    isn't it obvious when you get negative of identity matrix?? when you get that matrix ... you should be very happy.

    • one year ago
  17. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Yes. I'm very happy :D

    • one year ago
  18. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I love identity matrix :DDD

    • one year ago
  19. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So, @walters You're good so far with \[\huge A^2=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{matrix}\right]\]?

    • one year ago
  20. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes

    • one year ago
  21. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    we can proceed

    • one year ago
  22. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So, now, let's work on A^3... We get... \[\huge A^3 = A^2A=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix}0 & -i \\ -i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\] Following this so far?

    • one year ago
  23. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes

    • one year ago
  24. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So now, we compute A^4

    • one year ago
  25. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    \[\large A^4=A^2A^2=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  26. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    See where it has taken us?

    • one year ago
  27. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So, A^4 it seems, is the identity matrix.

    • one year ago
  28. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes it is the identity

    • one year ago
  29. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So... we started with A, and it turns out A^4 is the identity. So that must mean <A> has four elements, right?

    • one year ago
  30. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wow this is interesting

    • one year ago
  31. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    So... have you arrived at your conclusion?

    • one year ago
  32. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no it is just that i have flash even if i don't know wat to do next

    • one year ago
  33. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Well, the 4 elements are just \[\huge <A>=\left\{I_2 \ , \ A \ , \ A^2 \ , \ A^3 \right\}\] Where \[\huge A=\left[\begin{matrix}0 & i \\ i & 0\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • one year ago
  34. walters Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so it means there is no need to show those axioms of subgroup

    • one year ago
  35. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    No need at all :) It has already been assumed (correctly) that <A> is a subgroup.

    • one year ago
  36. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Well, I'm sleepy, but I think we covered the gist of this question :) Signing off now :D ---------------------------------- Terence out

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.