A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Schrodinger
 3 years ago
This isn't a numerical question but moreso conceptual. So, my Calculus textbook has the following paragraph regarding Local Extrema:
Schrodinger
 3 years ago
This isn't a numerical question but moreso conceptual. So, my Calculus textbook has the following paragraph regarding Local Extrema:

This Question is Closed

Schrodinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0"If the domain of ƒ is the closed interval [a, b], then ƒ has a local maximum at the endpoint \[x=a\] if \[f(x) \le f(a)\] for all x in some halfopen interval Likewise, f has a local maximum at an interior point \[x = c\] if \[f(x) \le f(c)\]for all x in some open interval \[(c \delta, c+\delta), \delta > 0\] and a local maximum at the endpoint \[x = b\]if \[f(x) \le f(b)\]for all x in some halfopen interval \[(b \delta,b],\delta > 0.\] The inequalities are reversed for local minimum values. In Figure 4.5, the function ƒ has local maxima at c and d and local minima at a, e, and b. Local extrema are also called relative extrema. Some functions can have infinitely many local extrema, even over a finite interval." I get why [a, b] has to be a closed interval, but I don't understand what the consequences would be for the above statements regarding local extrema if they had closed intervals. i.e., why are some of them halfopen? I don't understand how them being closed would be an issue or challenge the logic of the statements.

Schrodinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Whoops, missed a portion. Right after "in some halfopen interval" for an endpoint maxima for a:\[[a, a+\delta), \delta > 0\]

Schrodinger
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Is it just because delta can't be actually quantified/defined and is essentially an arbitrary number, while [a,b] are definite fixed end points? So basically the openended statement is just a reinforcement that the halfopen interval can be anything?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Having the point in question is necessary. In order to have a, for example, in the interval you construct it needs to be closed on one side at least since it it at the end of your [a,b]. For c to be within, since it is in (a,b) it is possible to have an open interval around in on both sides. Why intervals are kept open when involving the delta I'm not exactly sure

amistre64
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1it might have to do with the infinitesimal property of the a+g, you would not use a closed interval to express infinity, so it might be improper to use it on an infinitesimal as well
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.