Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

zane120000

  • one year ago

session 42 problem:non-independent variables 3.Now suppose w is as above and x^2y +y^2x = 1. Assuming x is the independent variable, find ∂w/∂x. The answer is here:http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/2.-partial-derivatives/part-c-lagrange-multipliers-and-constrained-differentials/session-42-constrained-differentials/MIT18_02SC_pb_42_comb.pdf I don't understand why we should set z = 0.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Waynex
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Good question zane120000. We have a three variable equation, x, y, and z. We are told that x and y are related by a constraint equation. That means that any change in x produces a known change in y. The variable y is therefore totally dependent on x. This reasoning is reversible and x could be totally dependent on changes in y, but we are told in the question to assume that it is y that is dependent. But that leaves a third variable hanging there, z. What do we do with that z? Well, we just want to know what the rate of change is for w when x changes. If we allow z to have a value that changes, this corrupts our calculation. We only want to know how w changes when x changes. Therefore we zero out any independent variables other than x.

  2. zane120000
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thank you for your response,Waynex! I got a deeper understanding with your help! Then I still have a question:When z have a different value from 0,will ∂w/∂x differ?Or will ∂w/∂x varies when a point moves vertically in cartesian coefficient?

  3. Waynex
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That's a great point. And I don't know what the answer is supposed to be, but I did take a look at that while I was going through that pdf. If we did set z to a value other than 0, the x and y variables would show up in more places and the value does seem like it would change. Would that change be linear? If so, then the change is not as interesting as if might be if it was not linear. I suspect that this is like calculating a single variable derivative at a specific point. For instance, if we calculate the derivative of 2x^3=y, we get 6x^2=dy. Perhaps we want to know the rate of change in y at the specific x location of 1, then we get 6(1^2)=dy. Similarly, we could ask what the partial of w with respect to partial x is when z is fixed to 5, and plug in 5 for z.

  4. zane120000
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Recently I thought over the question for long.Finally I agree with your opinion :we should ask the partial derivatives in particular point.thank you for you answer again!

  5. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.