Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

Has anyone proved that y=2y zero on that problem in the first lecture where he used symmetry to get that y=2y zero? Could you help because I keep getting y=2/x zero.

MIT 18.01 Single Variable Calculus (OCW)
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I would need to see the actual problem.
y-y zero=-1/(x zero)^2 (x-x zero) is the problem. The professor solved for x by plugging in y=0 and got x=2x zero which I understand. Then he said by symmetry you get y=2y zero and we could prove it by taking the same equation and plugging in x=0. Every time I do that, I get y= 2/x zero, not y=2y.
Based on what you are saying, I am assuming that previously in the lecture, it was stated that \[y _{0} = -\frac{ 1 }{ x _{0} }\]If that is the case, then \[x _{0} = -\frac{ 1 }{ y _{0} }\] and \[y=2y _{0}\]

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

i must be doing something wrong...thanks anyway
The area of the triangle as he derives is 2XoYo. As y = f(x) = 1/X, f(Xo) = 1/Xo. Therefore Yo = 1/Xo. Thus, 2XoYo = 2Xo(1/Xo) = 2

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question